Uncoated Carl Zeiss Jena 5cm F2 to Leica mount, with a 1958 Tabbed J-8 mount.

Sonnar Brian

Product of the Fifties
Staff member
Local time
5:32 AM
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
19,625
I picked up a 1958 Zorki 3C with a perfect-glass J-8 this month- with the intent to clean and shim the lens for Leica mount. Gave the focus mount the full works, including using fiber-optic polishing sheets for the finish and metal-to-metal movements. Came out really smooth. The Tabbed J-8 mounts with the three screws for the retaining ring holding the mount in are the easiest to work on, and come out the smoothest for operation. The tolerances are tighter than the 1960s lenses for RF vs actual Distance.

Got the lens shimmed for close-up, but would not focus past 10m. Th focal length was much longer than most, could not use on a Leica. SO- yesterday I used the J-8 mount for a Sonnar conversion. A very clean glass 5cm F2. Came out beautifully. Some pre-war Sonnars require you swap out the Aperture ring when screwing into a J-8 focus mount. This one did not. Once shimmed, re-indexing was simple: take out the longer set screws and use shorter ones. No need for Taps, the screws hold the mechanism against the underlying threads for the aperture ring.
RIMG0533.jpgRIMG0535.jpg
 
Wide-Open at F2.
L1025665.jpgL1025666.jpgL1025670.jpgL1025671.jpgL1025675.jpgL1025688.jpg

The 1958 J-8- I mounted in a 1951 Focus mount sent for spare parts, that I used for practice. Re-assembled, found enough set screws to complete it.
It will be fine for mirrorless cameras.
 
It's difficult to find the 5cm F2 with clean glass- after 20+ years, maybe one in ten? This one is nice, and has a good bloom. I need to put a yellow filter on it and try with the M Monochrom.
 
I’d say 1 in 100 but maybe I’m just unlucky. 😂

Guys, it may just be part of my incredible run of luck but the Contax II has a 5cm '36 f/2.0 CZJ that seems to my amateur eyes to be clean. I just pulled it off the camera and peered through it. This may just be another example of the Dunning-Kruger effect. I will not know for sure until I send in a roll of film for processing and scanning. You can be sure that it is wearing a UV filter to be sure that it stays safe. And it has passed through Oleg's skillful hands for a camera and lens CLA.

The Contax III will go off to Oleg after the next Portland camera meet. It has the standard III lens, CZJ 5cm 1.5 and this one has factory coating. And if the coating is intact I think it is safe to assume the front element is fine. Is it possible the rear element is coated or do my eyes have wishful seeing?
 
Is it possible the rear element is coated or do my eyes have wishful seeing?
I have seen quite a mix of coated CZJ lenes that are not T-marked. Some are coated on all surfaces, while others may have only the fronter-most surfaces coated, while the rear triplet may be uncoated.
 
Last edited:
I have seen quite a mix of coated CZJ lenes that are not T-marked. Some are coated on all surfaces, while others may have only the fronter-most surfaces coated, while the rear triplet may be uncoated.

Thank you.
 
Bright, Sunny Day. I took this lens out for a second test- this time on the Leica M240. The focus via RF agrees perfectly with the EVF. I used the M8 to test the focus when shimming this lens. I have the M8 and M240 "Tuned" to my M9, which has been used to shim lenses for many Leicas.

"Stupid Brick Wall test" at F2 and F4,
M2406893.jpgM2406894.jpg

Followed by the slat Test, F2 and F4.

M2406899.jpgM2406900.jpg

And of course the Fence Post,
F2 and F4
M2406881.jpgM2406882.jpg
 
Color test... at F2.
This is an uncoated lens, but Bloom (oxidation) acts like a lens coating. Remember- Lens coatings were first pursued as a method of artificially introducing Bloom to a lens and not having to wait 50+ years for nature to do it for you.

M2406886.jpgM2406887.jpgM2406889.jpgM2406892.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom