I am very very glad to read this, Jan. Thank you for finding it and posting it.
I last used UPS when I ordered a $25 sweatshirt from the U.S. I ordered it on-line. I chose regular airmail. The vendor unilaterally chose UPS because THEY got a good rate. UPS arrived at my door in Toronto wanting something like $38 for brokerage fees. I rejected the package. Flat-out. Screw 'em. UPS didn't get a dime, I got my refund on the $25 and I didn't have to wear something that I didn't need anyway. A bit of a pyrrhic victory, but nice nonetheless.
As for this class-action business, B.C. has pretty good class-action laws. Saskatchewan believe it or not is considered the most liberal for class-actions. If someone tries it in Ontario too, not so great. There's one particular judge in Toronto who gets a lot of class-action certification requests. His name is Mr. Justice Nordheimer. On more than one occasion he has taken perfectly good class-actions, denied certification, and ordered costs personally against the lead plaintiff for $250,000 or so. To say the least he has a "chilling effect" on class-actions in the province.
For the American readers who support the Canadian UPS lawsuit idea, you'll be glad to know that in Canada we have an "English system" of legal costs. This means that if UPS loses, or even settles privately, not only does it pay the money it owes but it must pay a good-sized share of the winner's attorney fees. That doesn't happen in the U.S. One of the many reasons Americans (and their lawyers) are so sue-happy in the U.S. is that the loser doesn't have to pay the winner's lawyer fees like they do in Canada, England, Australia, etc. It rewards legitimate lawsuits but discourages misguided ones. Uh, I'm getting a wee bit off-topic.
In conclusion, good on ya to the righteous guy in B.C. I'll pitch into the legal fund too.