yanidel
Well-known
Yes, and I also think there is a trade-off between sensor size, light attributes and technology.There is such a thing as diminishing returns, and in this case it is a biological limit. Even if an image is magnitudes "better" in objective measurement, if your eye cannot see it, it is meaningless. Sensor technology is close to hitting that limit.
At some points, pixels will hit the limit on their minimum size and users won't want cameras that are too big to fit bigger sensors. The question is to what #pixels and ISO this limit corresponds to. To what I have read, there isn't that much time before we get there.