kevin m
Veteran
I used to shoot weddings with two M6TTL's, two SF-20's with Lutz's S-FILL and Nikon off-camera TTL cords, plus an EOS-3/EX-550 for things the rangefinder couldn't do, macro, etc.
Having done that, honestly, I think any M body is best suited to available light work. I did get good results using the SF-20's, but 'degree of difficulty' simply doesn't count when trying to deliver consistently good images. And flash work is such an important part of wedding shoots that I think using any M body as your primary camera is a handicap.
Once you start strapping flashes and sync cords on your M, you'd really be better off using a CaNikon. And if you're planning on shooting a 100% available light wedding, well....who are you shooting to impress, the bride, or your pals on this forum? 🙂
If I had to do it again, I would reverse the proportions: Two Canon SLR bodies for the bulk of the wedding, and an M body loaded with B&W film for those times when it's the right tool. And because it simply brings me pleasure to use the damned thing. 🙂
Having done that, honestly, I think any M body is best suited to available light work. I did get good results using the SF-20's, but 'degree of difficulty' simply doesn't count when trying to deliver consistently good images. And flash work is such an important part of wedding shoots that I think using any M body as your primary camera is a handicap.
Once you start strapping flashes and sync cords on your M, you'd really be better off using a CaNikon. And if you're planning on shooting a 100% available light wedding, well....who are you shooting to impress, the bride, or your pals on this forum? 🙂
If I had to do it again, I would reverse the proportions: Two Canon SLR bodies for the bulk of the wedding, and an M body loaded with B&W film for those times when it's the right tool. And because it simply brings me pleasure to use the damned thing. 🙂