jesse1dog
Light Catcher
A lot of members have their own website and it's always interesting to see their constriction, and contents.
What is rarely expressed is the reaction of viewers to all the effort involved. So having got a website 'up and running' more or less to my satisfaction I now wonder how potential viewers react to the several albums I have included.
More to the point is viewing determined by the number of photos included in an album.
Is there a 'best' number of photos to include?
For instance 5 seems too few.
10 - 15 related photos seems reasonable.
20 - 25 carefully chosen photos will keep the viewers interest?
How about an album with 40 - 50 photos?
Would you bother to look, or is time too short?
Reaction, suggestions and advice please.
jesse
What is rarely expressed is the reaction of viewers to all the effort involved. So having got a website 'up and running' more or less to my satisfaction I now wonder how potential viewers react to the several albums I have included.
More to the point is viewing determined by the number of photos included in an album.
Is there a 'best' number of photos to include?
For instance 5 seems too few.
10 - 15 related photos seems reasonable.
20 - 25 carefully chosen photos will keep the viewers interest?
How about an album with 40 - 50 photos?
Would you bother to look, or is time too short?
Reaction, suggestions and advice please.
jesse