finguanzo
Well-known
Im with him CK Dexter Haven
...dark times is when thousands of negatives end up in a storage facility because no one cares and then they get auctioned off for peanuts and then they make thousands for someone who lucked onto them...
Korean War? Civil Rights? Hiding under a desk? 52,000 dead in Vietnam? Murdered: Kennedy, King, Kennedy? Riots in almost every major city in America? Watt, Chicago, Detroit, NYC? Mafia, Hells Angels, KKK, Church bombing.? Etc., ect. Not dark? Maybe, it all depends where you were in the 1950s and 1960s. I could go on with polio, cataracks, and other diseases that today are curable but if the 1950's and 1960s were good times compared today...
I have the book and reviewed it in the " latest additions to your library" thread a week ago. My copy of this book is excellent from an image quality, printing and binding perspective. I'm a frequent contributor to the "additions" thread and I have a lot of photo books for comparison; this book stands with the best of them.How many people in this post actually have the book? I am just curious.
I have the book and reviewed it in the " latest additions to your library" thread a week ago. My copy of this book is excellent from an image quality, printing and binding perspective. I'm a frequent contributor to the "additions" thread and I have a lot of photo books for comparison; this book stands with the best of them.
I have posted a PS to my original post.
The book has a retail price of $46.
At that price, almost evrything on the shelves at your local Barnes&Nobles is less expensive.
This isn't a very good argument.
Just off the top of my head--for better production and lower prices:
* Any and all National Geographic books
* Ansel Adams --coffee table sized <$40
* Annie Liebovitz- coffee table sized books
*Galen Rowell-coffee table sized books
Other types of photo books:
*Dorthea Lange's "Daring To Look"
* Sophie Howard & Stephen McCohen "Street Photography Now"
All of the above are better produced and cost less.
Texsport
Texsport
I suppose everyone's entitled to criticize a book but this is the most curious criticism of a book I've ever heard. Basically it's "the book's not good because other books are printed in a way you like and this isn't; additionally other books cost less so this book isn't as good... "
How do you order coffee in a restaurant? Is it a bad coffee if it's expensive and good if it's less expensive? This is definitely a different way to look at books.
Anyway I got your message in the OP and I'm genuinely sorry the book disappointed you, I found it to be a "two thumbs up"
We agree to disagree on the Maier book.:angel:
Texsport