I'm not going to go overboard with testing since 1) I don't have the patience for it, 2) I don't know where my tripod is, 3) it is super cold outside, and 4) I only have a Monochrom digital M, so the results might not be that interesting to people.
That being said, I made a few comparison shots and put them on flickr (link below). I'll add more there if I make any. Shot with the VM APO-Lanthar, Zeiss C-Sonnar, and Leica 50/1.4 ASPH at a few different apertures.
So far I am seeing that the APO-Lanthar vignettes a fair amount for a non-compact f/2 lens, can have slightly busier bokeh (compared to the Summilux ASPH), and has a larger apparent DOF at the same aperture as the other two lenses. I was able to get a small image forming flare with it at f/2 - same with the C-Sonnar while the Leica avoided it.
Using numbers I found on the net (Lens Rentals), the Leica is 51.4mm and the C-Sonnar is 50.3mm, which puts the APO-Lanthar at 48.5(ish)mm. It is noticeably wider than the other two when comparing shots from the same vantage point.
Oh, and it is SUPER SHARP. At f/2, it is incredibly contrasty and high resolution across the frame. So much so that it got me thinking something is wrong with my ASPH (only kind of joking here).
flickr album