Voigtlander Ultron 35mm F2 Aspherical Images

M2, Voigtlander Ultron 35mm f2 II, Tri-x

52262304679_448e778e58_b.jpg
 
Both 35mm Ultron f/2 versions have the same lens formula, but v. II is slightly heavier (brass), has a dual distance scale, and has a traditional tab.

Although I like the performance of my v. 1, I've not been particularly happy with its handling. Does anyone think it would be worth the "upgrade" cost (about $250) from v.1 to v. II?
 
Bill Blackwell said:
Both 35mm Ultron f/2 versions have the same lens formula, but v. II is slightly heavier (brass), has a dual distance scale, and has a traditional tab.

Although I like the performance of my v. 1, I've not been particularly happy with its handling. Does anyone think it would be worth the "upgrade" cost (about $250) from v.1 to v. II?
Click to expand...

It really just comes down to personal preference. As you say, optical performance is identical between the two versions, so...
- Do you want feet on the distance scale?
- Do you prefer a tab to a stick?
- Is $250 a significant about of money to you?

Personally I'm perfectly happy with the v1, but I'm not you 🙂
 
nickthetasmaniac said:
It really just comes down to personal preference. As you say, optical performance is identical between the two versions, so...
- Do you want feet on the distance scale?
- Do you prefer a tab to a stick?
- Is $250 a significant about of money to you?

Personally I'm perfectly happy with the v1, but I'm not you 🙂
Click to expand...
I know I wasn't particularly clear, but what I really want to know is: has anyone made the "upgrade" from v. 1 to v. II and are you satisfied with the change given the cost to do so?
 
Bill Blackwell said:
Both 35mm Ultron f/2 versions have the same lens formula, but v. II is slightly heavier (brass), has a dual distance scale, and has a traditional tab.

Although I like the performance of my v. 1, I've not been particularly happy with its handling. Does anyone think it would be worth the "upgrade" cost (about $250) from v.1 to v. II?
Click to expand...

My Ultron 35 is version 1 with the focusing stick. I’m ok w/ it and have no intention of replacing it w/ version 2.
 
Bill Blackwell said:
I know I wasn't particularly clear, but what I really want to know is: has anyone made the "upgrade" from v. 1 to v. II and are you satisfied with the change given the cost to do so?
Click to expand...

I had a version 1. Sold it. Got the version 2. I liked the overall aesthetic of the v1 - I thought it looked very nice. In hindsight, I really didn't mind the focusing stick...but I convinced myself that I'd like the tab more. The v2 felt much nicer in hand (black paint on brass is v classy...the chromed aluminum accents on the 1 seemed soft/dentable), but it always struck me as a barrel design that was a retro-fit (for all I know Cosina always planned on making a version 2 rather than releasing it as reaction to the complaints about the focus stick on the version one...it just looks like they tried to redesign the barrel as an after thought...the proportions of it aren't pleasing to my eye...I know that's being nit-picky). If I had to do it over again, I'd probably have just stuck with the v1. The v2 does feel very, very nice though...

I ended up selling the v2 to buy a LLL 8-element. It's slightly smaller, with slightly better build quality (at least at first glance...we'll see how it holds up). That being said, the Ultron is sharper at all apertures.
 
It's a great little lens,good build quality and superb optics, with rendering that just avoids looking too modern. Highly recommended
 
the_jim said:
... I ended up selling the v2 to buy a LLL 8-element. It's slightly smaller, with slightly better build quality (at least at first glance...we'll see how it holds up). That being said, the Ultron is sharper at all apertures.
Click to expand...
Ironically, I've been eyeing the LLL 8-element for some time. I just can't bring myself to buy it (reported copy variations and QC issues). IMHO, they're trying to get too much money for it.

I have decided to purchase the v. II Ultron to replace my v. 1 copy. I believe the handling and weight of the v. II will be more to my liking.
 
Bill Blackwell said:
Ironically, I've been eyeing the LLL 8-element for some time. I just can't bring myself to buy it (reported copy variations and QC issues). IMHO, they're trying to get too much money for it.

I have decided to purchase the v. II Ultron to replace my v. 1 copy. I believe the handling and weight of the v. II will be more to my liking.
Click to expand...

I bet you’ll enjoy the V2. It’s a very nice lens.

I also understand your point about the LLL. I’d been eyeing it for a while…but it’s a fair chunk of change. Thankfully, a local store (Blue Moon Camera) is stocking them, so I was able to hold it in hand before making the purchase (and have the freedom to return it if anything goes wrong).
 
So I've had the version 1 Ultron 35mm f2.0 since late 2019 and have taken hundreds of photos w/ it, but all on a digital camera. At the end of June, I took advantage of a nearby classic car show to put the lens on my new to me M6 classic, and load up some Kodak Color Plus 200. Here are a couple results:

Vintage by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr

Vintage by Steve Macfarlane, on Flickr
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Yokosuka Mike
Voigtländer Ultron 27mm f2 (X-mount) lens - Images
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
16K
ficifolia
ficifolia
Yokosuka Mike
Voigtländer Macro APO-Ultron 35mm f2 (Fuji X-mount) lens - Images
2
Replies
39
Views
12K
Yokosuka Mike
Yokosuka Mike
CameraQuest
  • Sticky
Huge Voigtlander USA Lens Sale - M, E, Z, X, M43, AIS Mounts
Replies
0
Views
1K
CameraQuest
CameraQuest
A
Museum Watching
Replies
1
Views
126
Archiver
A
CameraQuest
Voigtlander 28mm F2 Aspheric $899
2
Replies
20
Views
3K
kshapero
kshapero
Back
Top Bottom