I like what f16sunshine said -- I feel very similar.
In related news, I was quite impressed by the results of the M9M ... when the conditions are right, there is some very pleasing tonality to the B+W images that really make me think there's really something special about that camera.
But then I went to flickr and looked up some images taken with a Leica M6 and Tri-X, and right away I thought 'WOW'. No hesitation -- the images grabbed me. Frankly, I think any half-decent photographer with a good camera and lens + some good B&W film can meet or exceed the results of the M9M for most mortals. And that's not even including enthusiasts who shoot strictly digital and love their digital workflow. There are beautiful images done by those people as well.
So I voted 'no' in the poll -- but I think the results will be more a reflection of the how much disposable income the members of RFF have, as opposed to their irrational love of the Leica brand. I mean, let's face it -- most of us have better things to do with $8000.
If I were to buy something with that kind of dough, it would be some fantastic glass -- Summilux, whatever. The left over money would buy me years of film to shoot afterward. Win-win!
It is truly a shame they priced this camera into the stratosphere -- otherwise it would have been a great 2nd body for a lot of pros and Leica enthusiasts alike. As it is, it will probably remain a low-volume niche product for a long time going forward.