kshapero
South Florida Man
Last week I was at wedding. One of my pet peeves is to check out what equipment the wedding photographers use. There were two photographers and one videographer. All told there 5 camera bodies. All five were Nikon D750's!. I asked one of them if they are all part of the same crew and he told me each are one of free lance on their own. What coincidence! No Canon's and no Nikon "pro" bodies. Really says something about the D750. Me, I had an M3 with Tri-X.
fireblade
Vincenzo.
My son got married a few weeks ago. The photographer had the latest Canon FF, and the two videographers were using Sony A7's.
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
I wonder why they had two still photographers who were not working together? That seems odd.
kshapero
South Florida Man
Yes it was odd to me, too.
lynnb
Veteran
I hope they managed to stay out of each other's way! Also, that guests were looking at only one camera when group photos were being taken. Sounds like a recipe for confusion.
farlymac
PF McFarland
Usually on a multi-photographer shoot like that, the second one does candids, while the first one does all the ceremony and set-ups, and coordinates with the videographer. Not unusual for all of them to be freelance, sometimes the main photographer is tasked with finding the others since they may be familiar with ones they have worked with before. A friend of mine once asked me to sub for him on a wedding with the very same set-up of two stills, and video. I did all the candids.
PF
PF
kshapero
South Florida Man
That makes sense. It was just rare to see 5 bodies at an event with all of them being the same brand and model.Usually on a multi-photographer shoot like that, the second one does candids, while the first one does all the ceremony and set-ups, and coordinates with the videographer. Not unusual for all of them to be freelance, sometimes the main photographer is tasked with finding the others since they may be familiar with ones they have worked with before. A friend of mine once asked me to sub for him on a wedding with the very same set-up of two stills, and video. I did all the candids.
PF
fireblade
Vincenzo.
I wonder why they had two still photographers who were not working together? That seems odd.
Yes it was odd to me, too.
I never asked the bride, now daughter in-law. Must ask.
Main tog with her back to us and the 2 Video boys on the right.
I have seen a couple of the short vids, impressive.

David Hughes
David Hughes
To me the obvious question is:- were they all male? (Asking about the opener; I can guess from the above... )
In the good old days when beer was 2d a pint etc, I'd take my wife who used an Olympus XA or XA2 for the candid shots. She was allowed places I was banned from and, obviously, the little baby XA's don't frighten people...
Regards, David
In the good old days when beer was 2d a pint etc, I'd take my wife who used an Olympus XA or XA2 for the candid shots. She was allowed places I was banned from and, obviously, the little baby XA's don't frighten people...
Regards, David
css9450
Veteran
Last week I was at wedding. One of my pet peeves is to check out what equipment the wedding photographers use. There were two photographers and one videographer. All told there 5 camera bodies. All five were Nikon D750's!.
As a D750 user, I say... That's awesome!
Timmyjoe
Veteran
Last wedding I attended a couple weeks ago, the wedding photographer crew (there's always a crew these days, never one photographer anymore) were all outfitted with Canon DSLR's and were shooting both stills and video.
I was shooting a 1936 Kodak Duo Six-20, but then, I'm a luddite.
Best,
-Tim
I was shooting a 1936 Kodak Duo Six-20, but then, I'm a luddite.
Best,
-Tim
gnuyork
Well-known
I have shot a few weddings (all Canon DSLR). One I even did video for (also Canon DSLR)...it's not what I do normally.
I'd LOVE it couples were bold enough to ask for B&W film only photos. If that became a thing, I think I would start doing weddings.
I'd LOVE it couples were bold enough to ask for B&W film only photos. If that became a thing, I think I would start doing weddings.
pvdhaar
Peter
The files from the D750 are amazing.. they're so malleable it's beyond belief. You can really work on those files without getting artifacts. And set to 14bit lossless, there's so much detail and dynamic range, that you can do wonders with the shadows....Really says something about the D750..
Out to Lunch
Ventor
Another wedding surprise: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj8WmIM0AHU
Ste_S
Well-known
Last week I was at wedding. One of my pet peeves is to check out what equipment the wedding photographers use. There were two photographers and one videographer. All told there 5 camera bodies. All five were Nikon D750's!. I asked one of them if they are all part of the same crew and he told me each are one of free lance on their own. What coincidence! No Canon's and no Nikon "pro" bodies. Really says something about the D750. Me, I had an M3 with Tri-X.
I got married a couple of weeks ago, both the photographer and our driver had full frame Canon DSLRs.
I shot a couple of rolls of Natura 1600 on a Pentax ME Super
Out to Lunch
Ventor
Wondering why your driver would have a full frame Canon dslr...
Jack Conrad
Well-known
Another wedding surprise: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj8WmIM0AHU
See? This would never have happened if they'd been shooting film.
BLKRCAT
75% Film
our photographer actually will be shooting with an XT-2 The engagement photos turned out better than I expected.
Whenever I attend weddings I will often bring along my M5 or in the past my M4 and it always seems to turn the heads of the photographers who are shooting at the wedding.
Whenever I attend weddings I will often bring along my M5 or in the past my M4 and it always seems to turn the heads of the photographers who are shooting at the wedding.
oftheherd
Veteran
Usually on a multi-photographer shoot like that, the second one does candids, while the first one does all the ceremony and set-ups, and coordinates with the videographer. Not unusual for all of them to be freelance, sometimes the main photographer is tasked with finding the others since they may be familiar with ones they have worked with before. A friend of mine once asked me to sub for him on a wedding with the very same set-up of two stills, and video. I did all the candids.
PF
I don't see anything wrong with that, I just never heard of it. I only did 4 or 5 weddings and did them by myself. I usually had my Fujica ST901, and Yashica TL Super as backup, then the Super Press 23 with a 65mm and 100mm lens. No video, although I did do that exclusively one time as a special request. I got roped into that by the chaplain who officiated.
Imagine, all film, except for that video. Guess I am dating myself, huh?
Bill Clark
Veteran
When I was hired to be the photographer for an event like a wedding, I always had an associate photographer. For me, the best surprise was no surprise.
The most important tool is the person using the equipment.
The most important tool is the person using the equipment.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.