What are you using for a light meter?

mdwsta4

Matty Westside
Local time
1:52 PM
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
464
Location
Los Angeles
I've been using my recently acquired M2 quite a bit as of late. It's my first camera not to have a built in light meter. To get around that I have an app on my iPhone and have also been using my M9 and x100s to gauge exposure.

But I thought it might be more convenient to get an actual light meter. Currently I'm debating between the Leica MC and the Sekonic 208.

Also stumbled upon two iphone add-ons. Plus side is they are extremely compact and I always have my phone with me. Downside is cost (for the lumu) and longevity (luxi). Does anyone have any experience with these?

Lumu
http://lu.mu

Luxi
http://www.esdevices.com/collections/all/products/luxi

What are you using for a light meter? Pros/cons?


Thanks!
M
 
I have various light meter but recently my most often used became the CV II because it is very accurate and small.

The LUXI arrived two days ago, I was keen to see if such a design could held up against a "real" light meter. Unfortunately the LUXI easily slips of the phone (mine is the iPhone 5 version) so I would not consider using it anymore.
 
I use a Sekonic L-398. I had tried a Leica MR meter, and it worked very well, but I don't like how the MR meter reverses the direction of the shutter speed dial. And it is easier to get incident readings with a handheld meter than a camera mounted one. Incident readings are genrally more accurate than reflected readings.
 
If you are going to spend hundreds of dollars (or more) on a Leica, spend a bit more and get a good light meter. Sekonic and Gossen make good, reliable products.
 
For my M2, other meterless cameras, and at times with digital cameras, a Sekonic L308s worn bandoleer fashion serves me well.

My phone has a meter app on it but my phone isn't anywhere near handy enough for how I use a meter. Phone cases with lanyards are few and those that I have seen either compromise the function of the phone or aren't nearly robust enough.
 
I agree ... not having to faff about with a meter is very liberating and it's a skill you'll come to grips with very quickly if you give yourself a chance.

It's true - I only take meter readings once every few hours when out shooting, or when switching between indoors and outdoors. Estimating exposure becomes easy with only a little practice, and using a meterless camera without a light meter feels quite natural.
 
Back
Top Bottom