What do The Rolling Stones and Film have in common?

[rhl-oregon]

I sit and watch
as Kodak goes by
(bye bye)

 

[shadowfox]

They both rock!

... and rolls!

😀

 

[farlymac]

Still good well past the "Use By' date.

PF

 

[Mablo]

I'm a flea bit peanut monkey, all my friends are Rodinal junkies.

(Monkey Man)

 

[ornate_wrasse]

"Up close and personal"

When I develop and print film, I feel that I have an up close and personal relationship with it.

When I was a teenager and groupie of sorts, I snuck into their hotel room in Washington, D.C. so I was "up close and personal" with them. No hanky panky whatsoever, but just had the chance to visit with them for a little while.

Ellen

 

[muser53]

I don't know but it must have something to do with Keith...

 

[.... _]

Mars Bars...

 

[Jaans]

No form answers here sorry ... you'll need to make up your own as we go! 🙂

I'll start ... and I do like The Stones, I just can't believe they've been banging away for fifty years! 😱



Sooooo ... what do The Rolling Stones and film have in common?

"It's been over for some time ... they just haven't realised it yet!" 😛

Actually apart from age they don't have much in common. Some of their recent tours earned revenue in excess of $250 million dollars. Not bad, not bad at all.

 

[raid]

Angie ... There must exist someone called Angie who uses film!

 

[andersju]

Jimmy Marshall...

Yes! Two exhibitions featuring some of his Stones photos just opened:

The Rolling Stones 1972, Photographs by Jim Marshall Seattle
JIM MARSHALL: The Rolling Stones and Beyond NYC

 

[Keith]

I don't think Keith Richards was fixed properly ... he seems to have suffered the most deterioration of the group. 😀

That said he has always been my favourite Rolling Stone and his familiarity with various chemicals is obvious to the eye! 😛

 

[DougFord]

sorry kids, the stones have been dead since '72, so no correlation there.
but Mick Taylor's tone is the equivalent of triX. 😛
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ8Bc6jz-W8