Sparrow
Veteran
No, so thank you for supporting my point.
I don't, clearly a photo is more likely to cross a language barrier than, em, language ... that's why it's called a language barrier ... but I expect you knew that
No, so thank you for supporting my point.
Not to compare, Fred, but this image tells a complete, universal story - the object of the press and it's use of imagery, no? It's a pretty fundamental question...![]()
Dear David,I think a photograph doesn't have to tell _THE_ story, but _A_ story to the viewer. It could be a different story to each viewer, based on their own background. The point is to elicit that extra dimension in the viewer's mind and emotions; while the specifics may be the different, the plot is universal (for a good one).
I don't think it get's much better than this:
http://www.darcypadilla.com/thejulieproject/intro.html
Though it sort of ruined my day... Well, let's say it changed my mood & temper (had to start doing something intrinsically untranscedental, like cleaning out the oven).I don't think it get's much better than this:
http://www.darcypadilla.com/thejulieproject/intro.html
never understood this term of "story telling"
wow thanks for deleting my picture mod
Not to compare, Fred, but this image tells a complete, universal story - the object of the press and it's use of imagery, no? It's a pretty fundamental question...![]()
was it YOUR image?
the rules do not allow for posting the work of others.
Rather than a story, to me this picture evokes a more universal emotion. Photographs to me are highly ambiguous for some reason...
1936. Great Depression. Supposed to be free of copyright by now.what about his then..
Don't ask! You'd not believe what a snivelling little wimp the American "Dennis the menace" is -- nothing like the real thing.... and it was going so well.
Did you get the Beano over there in the US? ... Dennis the menace, Gnasher and all that
Perfectly expressed.The first time I ran into the term 'visual storytelling' was when I read 'Lost of Laos', with the narrative on British war photographer Larry Burroughs and three colleagues being lost in a helicopter crash in 1971 over Laos, when they were reporting on the Vietnam war.
Burroughs was a master in visual storytelling and was granted awards for his ability to do so. He was acknowledged by many peers as being talented as a visual storyteller. His reportages were printed in Life, Time Magazine, many newspapers in the US and the UK, etc. They were always supported/elaborated with text.
In journalism, pictures are illustrations that accompany the words that tell the story. The words tell the story, the pictures show the story. To omit either one, would degrade the poignancy of the other.
I'm pretty confident that this is what the OP was driving at, not a debate on one picture being able to tell a story without any debate on what that story is. That seems rather academic and besides the point to me.
1936. Great Depression. Supposed to be free of copyright by now.
Perhaps that's also an answer as to why we're into the same s*** once more.
Nescio