Tuolumne
Veteran
uhligfd said:
Well, the girls are quite sensitive about how they look, and if I don't make them look attractive they get all camera phobic and blame me for taking unflattering photos.
/T
What do you do when your lens is TOO sharp?
- Thread starter Tuolumne
- Start date
- Latest activity Latest activity:
- Replies 39
- Views 3K
Well, the girls are quite sensitive about how they look, and if I don't make them look attractive they get all camera phobic and blame me for taking unflattering photos.
/T
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
Tuolumne said:
I was going to make an unsensitive statement about how we cater to these kids and how if they don't like the way they look it's your fault so you have to fix it for them but I decided to filter my thoughts so as not to offend...
I would rather see a true picture of myself and see what I need to work on rather than a lie...
Tuolumne
Veteran
nikon_sam said:
At the risk of making a sexist statement, I think all female performers are like this. I'd rather just change the photos than try to change them. :angel:
/T
angeloks
Well-known
Use some fine grain sandpaper and use it on the front and rear element of the lens...
Bryce
Well-known
Quote "I was only kidding about sanding the lens. I am not a NUT!"
If you really like the carborundum idea, try it on a cheap or already damaged filter. Don't be a nut!
If you really like the carborundum idea, try it on a cheap or already damaged filter. Don't be a nut!
sirius
Well-known
Start working with your aperture wide open.
M
mikeh
Guest
Leave the lens, but buy her some Clearasil.
Sonnar Brian
Established
Buy a 9cm F4 Elmar. They are cheap. Older 9cm F2 Summicron, fast and big.
M. Valdemar
Well-known
Actually, your original shots are not really all that sharp. The girls are wearing very heavily caked makeup and the direct light shows all their facial blemishes, which are somewhat severe.
Look for a Spiratone Portragon with the appropriate T-mount.
Look for a Spiratone Portragon with the appropriate T-mount.
SolaresLarrave
My M5s need red dots!
Nylon stocking in the front element ought to do the trick. Or a softening filter.
In short, you don't have a problem; your models do. 🙂
In short, you don't have a problem; your models do. 🙂
peterm1
Veteran
There are some freeware stand alone packages especially for this type of application. I am not at my own PC right now and cannot recall the names but a search of "imaging software freeware" will probably turn up some examples on Google. (I think one may be named something like photo or image enhancer / beautifier - try combos of these words in a search.) The ones I have tried work pretty well by reducing blemishes and variations in skin tones without unduly reducing image sharpness - depending on how much you adjust the toggle on the slider bar or whatever. The only issue is that standalone software involves a separate workflow process outside of Photoshop - unless of course you can find a Photoshop plug in that does this task. There may be some plugins if you are willing to pay but I do not recall seeing any free ones. If you are an experienced Photoshop user you can do the same using Layers, a noise filter (like gaussian blur) and various strengths of transparency int he overlay. Personally, perhaps as I am not an expert in PS, I find it much more satisfactory to use a piece of software to do the hard work for me.
Tuolumne
Veteran
Brian Sweeney said:
I have these. Don't know why I didn't think to bring them, especially since I was determined to shoot at f4 or slower. But the F2 Summicron makes a Noctilux look small.
/T
dll927
Well-known
At one time, Minolta, and probably others, had a soft-focus lens. There was something of a claim that it was more popular in Japan than anywhere else.
Sounds like a diffusion filter might work.
As for that sawing a board too short, there's another version of that. Chefs gradually add salt during the cooking process, on the basis that you can always add more, but you can't take it out.
Sounds like a diffusion filter might work.
As for that sawing a board too short, there's another version of that. Chefs gradually add salt during the cooking process, on the basis that you can always add more, but you can't take it out.
Tuolumne
Veteran
sirius said:
I had been doing this, and the photos that worked were great. Unfortunately, because everything is in motion on the stage, many shots were too soft from being out of focus. So, I stopped down. That solved that problem, but then I got all the facial blemishes in focus and so it became, as Roseann Roseanna Dana said," If it's not one thing, it's another."
/T
Spyderman
Well-known
Jupiter-9 ? (85/2)
Sonnar type lenses tend to be softer overall, and a J-9 isn't all that expensive (at least compared to a Summilux). And there are also other Sonnars out there (Canon, Nikkor)...
Sonnar type lenses tend to be softer overall, and a J-9 isn't all that expensive (at least compared to a Summilux). And there are also other Sonnars out there (Canon, Nikkor)...
PaulDalex
Dilettante artist
What I do?
I celebrate.
"Too sharp" is the definition of happiness.
Although I have some skill with Photoshop, in an effort to improve at making women more beautiful, I printed a course of PopPhoto on this subject.
I think it will come useful to me soon.
Here is the link:
http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/4960/digital-toolbox-how-to-edit-portraits.html
But rush, they might move it.
Cheers
Paul
I celebrate.
"Too sharp" is the definition of happiness.
Although I have some skill with Photoshop, in an effort to improve at making women more beautiful, I printed a course of PopPhoto on this subject.
I think it will come useful to me soon.
Here is the link:
http://www.popphoto.com/popularphotographyfeatures/4960/digital-toolbox-how-to-edit-portraits.html
But rush, they might move it.
Cheers
Paul
noci
Established
the old canon 85 2.0 serenar could help you out. a lot softer!
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
First, I found your picture to be "soft-sharp"--that is, sharp enough, but with a nicely rounded quality that lends itself well to the subjects. To answer the question, my solution was to pick up a Summar, an f/1.5 Summarit, and an uncoated Elmar to experiment with, for times when I want a softer image than my ASPH lenses can produce.
Incidentally, I read that some some motion picture directors have found modern lenses to be too sharp for certain movies that call for a softer look. I think it is a valid point, though I think that softness and glow should be used sparingly, and not allowed to become an end in themselves.
Incidentally, I read that some some motion picture directors have found modern lenses to be too sharp for certain movies that call for a softer look. I think it is a valid point, though I think that softness and glow should be used sparingly, and not allowed to become an end in themselves.
ampguy
Veteran
Use an Industar-22 collapsible lens. Push the lens in about a couple of mm from fully extended. Perfect Leica glow, plus added portrait softness.
No sandpaper needed.
No sandpaper needed.
eli griggs
Well-known
You could try shooting b&w in lighting/staging you can't control, with a light green filter and reserve color for shots you set-up yourself. Explain to the girls that the stage lighting was bad and you wanted to work in a 'classic' style, they looked so good!
Cheers
Cheers
Similar threads
- Article
- Article
