What happened to the (NEW) Voigtlander 35mm f2.0 ASPH VM Vintage lens

I could't agree more. Examples enough of fine looking 35mm lenses: 35mm f/2.8 Summaron and 35mm f/2 Summicron v1. Just make a lens exactly look like these, but then in black paint on brass. Is that so hard? Cosina can do it, see the Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5 LTM.


Erik.


Or 35 1.4. Beautiful lens.
 
I guess Voigtlander was going with the penguin design. Wait, was it racoon? No panda, that's it! The panda version but wearing mirrored sunglasses.
 
I could't agree more. Examples enough of fine looking 35mm lenses: 35mm f/2.8 Summaron and 35mm f/2 Summicron v1. Just make a lens exactly look like these, but then in black paint on brass. Is that so hard? Cosina can do it, see the Color-Skopar 50mm f/2.5 LTM.


Erik.


In this case I can't understand your problem.
Why don't you buy these Summaron/Summicron lenses, if design is so important for you that you get angry? :confused:

For me image quality, size, weight and price are more important when buying a lens than a chrome design feature.
 
I imagine it will take a while for reviews. I suspect most people already have a 35mm lens. Do they need another?


Yes, of course!
I had two 35mm M lenses (beside an old Summaron with LTM, but only for my IIIf)

- The great Ultron 1.7/35 VM, which is a bit large and has no focus tab or stick.
- Summaron 2,8/35, which is small, classic and a bit slow.

I'm going to sell both and replace them with the new Ultron 35mm f2.

So, to answer your question, yes, I needed another one :D
 
I've had mine (I got it used for a great deal!) for a couple weeks now. I unfortunately haven't gotten to shoot much with it, work has been getting in the way of life. I do like the results I have been gotten back with some pushed Tri-X and on digital as well. It compares IQ and performance wise with my Planar ZM which is exactly what I was looking for and is high praise.
 
Back
Top Bottom