GaryLH
Veteran
Is the m4/3 system more a replacement for the point and shoot, a supplementary camera system for travelling light, or is it more versatile than that? Are they suited to wild life photography, especially with the crop factor, or is it a battle with limitations inherent in the system?
Intrigued,
David
For me m43 was the default travel setup for
- lightness vs higher iso capability compared to p&s, but Sony recently changed the rules with the rx100
-- iso 1600 very usable on rx100 from a sensor half the size
- set of small lenses that are small in size even compared to rf lenses that are reasonably fast
-- 12f2, 14f2.5, 17f2.8, 20f1.7, 25f1.4, 50f1.8
- Olympus omd w/12-50 fully weatherproof setup.
- omd has the most sophisticated in body IS of any camera I know of
- only in last year m43 finally upgraded there sensor technology to 16mp and good iso performance to 1600, w/ omd leading the charge w/ I believe a Sony sensor
These days, if u can keep as close to base iso as possible, even p&s can deliver some great pictures compared to even 2 to 3 years back... Canon s100 series, Panasonic LX series, Fuji xf1, and x10 are prime examples. Sony's rx100 recently blew that all out the door w/ clean iso up to 800 and very useable up to 1600..
Cheers
Gary
Ps. Just noticed this post on Steve Huff site about a pro photographer that normally uses Nikon d3, that is currently taking a 8 month vacation w/ his wife and using the omd instead of the d3.
http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2012/...r-8-months-with-an-olympus-om-d-by-james-cox/
Last edited: