BillBingham2
Registered User
Rumor has it that some folks in BedSty are trying to make fake 1000/6.3 but in gang colors! I miss the Ave N stop on the F.
B2 (;->
B2 (;->
jsuominen said:After reading last night Bob Rotoloni's Nikon Rangefinder Camera -book, I'll vote "1000/6.3 Black". 🙂
MikeL said:Don't just go along because "the man" says so. Oh wait, he is The Man. Uh, good choice, yah. 🙂
So that means the two rarest Nikon lenses are the 1000/6.3 (black) and either the 50/3.5 (non-micro) or the 35/1.8 (black rim).CameraQuest said:only 11 out of 55 voters got got either of the two reported rarest lenses correct.
that is because the rarest reported lens to Bob is usually not considered all that rare -- in error.
more later in the day.
Stephen
CameraQuest said:only 11 out of 55 voters got got either of the two reported rarest lenses correct.
jsuominen said:What would be the prize for the 'winners'? Bob's new book, after it has been published or 1000/6.3 Black? 😉
Why the 50/1.5 and not the 85/2?
wes loder said:As I pointed out in my talk in 2006, and in my forthcoming book, NK did not start to sell the 35mm f3.5 until the spring of 1950. No 35mm lens was sold with the Nikon I. There was an initial series with the aperture ring reversed that was apparently a first run, and is quite rare, but it was not available in either 1948 or 1949. A few variframe finders were sold for the Nikon I, and these do have a marking for the 35, but that was in anticipation of production.
I remain curious about Stephen's 157 number for the 500 f5, since I have records of serial numbers from 021 through 272. Where is the gap or gaps? Thanks, WES
CameraQuest said:Hi Wes,
the figures came from Bob Rotoloni.
I know from private emails that neither Bob or I agree with your take the 35/3.5 production did not start with the Nikon One.
Please explain how you came to that conclusion, and whether or not any Nippon Kogaku employees of the time agree with you.
Thanks
Stephen