What is your 'camera for life'?

I wrote earlier that I didn't get the point of a "camera for life", since it's a replaceable, utilitarian tool like a hammer or wrench!

I also don't buy the argument that digital cameras are still evolving, unlike film cameras: digital cameras are now so advanced that major technological advances have plateaued and changes are incremental or novel (AI, pet eye recognition - which my Sony ACR IVa has and which I have no intention to use!). So, a decent digital camera, like a decent film camera, is more than good enough for any of us!

But of course many here are looking at the camera not as a utilitarian tool but as an object (for some reason Gollum comes to mind...!). So, what camera would I want to keep if not as a tool...?

A Jaeger‑LeCoultre Compass - with a 35mm roll-film back so I could use it!
 
I wrote earlier that I didn't get the point of a "camera for life", since it's a replaceable, utilitarian tool like a hammer or wrench!

Certainly, my choice(s) reflect that cameras are not designed to last forever.
The Ricoh GR is that essential everyday digital carry, but with miniaturisation comes fragility, so I would desire to have a lifetime supply of working GRs.
A Leica M film camera, with 35 or 50 Summilux, also matches the tool that would instantly be replaced if lost.
 
At the recent burial of Australian cinematographer and director Mark Toia, one of his friends placed a camera in the soil of his grave site, and his son placed the watch that Mark gave him into the soil, too.

Like an Egyptian Pharoah or Chinese Emperor, your crypt will be a vast underground chamber with a central sarcophagus on a dais, surrounded by scores of bodies and lenses from Nikon, Contax, Fuji, Leica and Rolleiflex, standing in perfect arrangement, silent soldiers protecting their master and being his eyes into eternity. 👑🙏

Many years ago in Melbourne, an ellderly German rogue who was a partner (of a sort) in a photo shop in the CBD, passed away and was interred at a gala ceremony attended by many of the city's photographers and camera shop owners. Even Leon Splitter was there, which made it a remarkable event. (Melbourne camera buyers from the '70s-'80-'90s will know this.)

I was overseas and missed that event, altho' if I had been around, I surely would have attended.

The story I've heard (second-handedly) from one of the attendees was, as the casket was lowered into the ground, his partner put a Leica M3 on top of the box ,which then descended into the ground, and was most likely buried.

If the tale is true, it meant the loss of a fine Leica.
 
Last edited:
I am not real clear on what part of this is so bizarre. I guess I look at this subject a little bit differently. I was 22 years old when my wife and I were married. In just a few months we will have been married for 50 years. A large percentage of our entire married life has been recorded on film that was exposed in a 35mm SLR that I bought about two years or so after we were married. I still own that camera and the 50mm lens that came with it and I still use it regularly. It has never failed to take pictures when I needed them. Sometimes I didn't do so well but that camera has recorded a LOT of our lives together. Children, houses, vacations, graduations, sporting events, cross-country moves, injuries, cars and on and on. If there is one camera in my life that qualifies as my "Camera for Life" it is that humble Pentax K1000 that I picked up at a pawn shop in Minneapolis in the late 70s. (EDIT - My wife says I bought it at a Pawn Shop in Reno in 1978 just before Xmas 😀) I have bought, owned and sold a lot of cameras between now and then, and still own several, but I still carry that poor little K1000 around with me regularly and I have no intention of ever getting rid of it. I have sent it in for cleaning and lubrication to Eric one time in that entire time period so I think I can absolutely testify that it is the most reliable camera I have ever owned.

More reminiscences.

Until the '90s the concept of owning one camera and a 50mm lens was the norm. Most of us had only the one lens, and we did everything with it. I was in my late 20s when I finally coughed up enough spare cash to buy additional glass, in my case two Hanimexes, a '35 and a '135 for a kit I took with me on a six-months tour of the Pacific and Asia. Somewhere along the way I acquired a zoomie, IRRC an Elicar 70-210 with glass I soon came to suspect was made from soft drink bottles. Used at f/11 it produced a few passably good Kodachrome slides, several of which I sold to stock photo markets.

Back in the day we didn't machine-gun film though our cameras, only the National Geographic honchos did that. Even if
Kodachrome processing was US $3 (in Canada K25 and K64 were sold process paid) and I could buy 120 film at a Kmart for a little over $1 a roll. The good old days, yeh.

For all that in the '70s in Canada and Australia films and processing were expensive. Many of us Canucks bought from discount photo stores in NYC and had our orders shipped by slow mail over the border, hoping Canada Customs wouldn't intercept the shipment and charge us duty, plus a penalty, which could be quite steep. I had friends in Maine and I used their address for my shipments and collected the stuff two times a year. Crossing the border back into Canada was an adventure, but I looked young and innocent and Customs didn't pay me any unwelcome attention. Once I was questioned about a camera (IRRC it was a well-worn Topcon SLR) and two lenses and a brick of film I had. I duly showed three exposed 35mm cassettes as 'evidence' that I had long owned the camera and I was let off. My criminal past now revealed...

I was in my late 20s and on a Pacific-Asia tour (this in 1974) when I decided to make the investment into additional lenses. In Sydney I coughed up the cash for two Hanimexes, a '35 and a '135, from Grace's pawn shop in Pott's Point - is that shop still in business? It was a treasure-trove for camera lovers, prices were reasonable and the older Mr Grace gave infinitely polite and good-mannered service to his customers. Later I bought an Exakta SLR and two Kodak Retinas from Grace's, the Varex traveled with me to Port Douglas in North Queensland and the two Retinas to Bali.

Movin' along, it wasn't until I landed a Pentax K1000 and two Takumars, bought from a passing traveler in need of cash to fund a flight to London, that I finally realised what quality glass was worth. In the late '70s I discovered Nikkormats, first an FTN, then an EL, finally two FT2s which I still have and use now and then.

In 1979 and 1982 I did cross-country trips across North America. In most US cities I visited many pawn shops where I saw an amazing quantity of quality cameras for sale at near-giveaway prices. Shelves of Nikon Fs and Nikon lenses, rows of Rollei TLRs, even in one shop an entire Speed Graphic kit with four lenses and film backs and even a copy stand on offer for $140. To this day I wonder where all this wonderful gear has ended up.

All my memories, all history now. Sepia-tinted with age - it seems like so many centuries ago.

Good cameras are good investments and with a little care and sensible use they last a long time. A pity it took me so long to realise that, but better late than never.
 
This thread is very interesting to read!

Considering i am turning 23 this year, i think i have a very different perspective to this question.

Right now i'd say my Nikon F2A and SP will be my cameras for life.

Someday i would love to try out a Leica M3 or M2, but i think i have already invested to much money in my Nikon
system. (mostly thanks to Stephen Gandys amazing collector website 😅)

If film has survived the digital craze of the 2000s and 2010s, it will also survive the following decades.

Getting old cameras repaired is something that needs to be considered of course. Who knows what time will bring.

Film prices aswell! I'm fine with using Fomapan 100 for BW and Kodak Gold 200 for color. (No need for fancy Portra or slide film)

picture-nikon1.jpg
 
@Bolo Kukus ... Hmm. I had more than one camera almost as soon as I could afford more than one camera, in about 1969 or 1970. Guess I'm an outlier.
@Christian.H2003 .... I love your energy and forward looking notions. Keep it up! This is why I, an ancient creaky old man, love to hang out with young folks. 😉

G
 
This thread is very interesting to read!

Considering i am turning 23 this year, i think i have a very different perspective to this question.

Right now i'd say my Nikon F2A and SP will be my cameras for life.

Someday i would love to try out a Leica M3 or M2, but i think i have already invested to much money in my Nikon
system. (mostly thanks to Stephen Gandys amazing collector website 😅)

If film has survived the digital craze of the 2000s and 2010s, it will also survive the following decades.

Getting old cameras repaired is something that needs to be considered of course. Who knows what time will bring.

Film prices aswell! I'm fine with using Fomapan 100 for BW and Kodak Gold 200 for color. (No need for fancy Portra or slide film)

View attachment 4888146


Resurgence and viability of film is a fantasy at best. Yeah, it's fun if you like to deal with market vagaries and processing. And ISO levels and color are not all that great. And film sales are a small fraction of the 35mm camera market for a reason. If you shoot digital you can modify the image to look like film. You will have a hard time making film as light sensitive, true and accurate IMNSHO.

Google is your friend:

The global 35mm film market is estimated to generate over $500 million in annual revenue, based on market analysis of sales volume and average selling prices. While exact 2024 revenue figures are not explicitly stated in the provided data, the market has shown consistent growth, with film sales volumes increasing by 18% in 2023 and projected to continue rising. Key players like Fujifilm, Kodak, and Lomography dominate the market, with Kodak and Fujifilm each holding approximately 40% of the market share. The resurgence in analog photography, driven by younger photographers, educational programs, and social media trends, continues to fuel demand despite supply constraints and price volatility.

Digital camera revenue in 2024 is projected to exceed USD 24 billion, according to multiple market forecasts. This marks a significant recovery for the industry after years of decline driven by smartphone competition. While unit sales saw a modest increase from 7.8 million in 2023 to 8.3 million in 2024, the revenue growth reflects stronger pricing, demand for high-end models, and renewed interest among enthusiasts and content creators. Some reports cite a 2024 market value of USD 18.59 billion, while others project USD 24.4 billion for 2025, indicating strong momentum in 2024.

I started with 35mm in around '53 or '54 and continued with it until 2000 when I bought a Sony DSC S70. I never shot film again.

I have a Contax II now and it is a gem. But ISO 400, 36 exposures and a minimum two week turnaround. Film is nostalgic fun for me and not much more. A good digital awards my feeble efforts with great color and IQ and now, not two weeks from now.
 
Resurgence and viability of film is a fantasy at best. Yeah, it's fun if you like to deal with market vagaries and processing. And ISO levels and color are not all that great. And film sales are a small fraction of the 35mm camera market for a reason. If you shoot digital you can modify the image to look like film. You will have a hard time making film as light sensitive, true and accurate IMNSHO.

Google is your friend:

The global 35mm film market is estimated to generate over $500 million in annual revenue, based on market analysis of sales volume and average selling prices. While exact 2024 revenue figures are not explicitly stated in the provided data, the market has shown consistent growth, with film sales volumes increasing by 18% in 2023 and projected to continue rising. Key players like Fujifilm, Kodak, and Lomography dominate the market, with Kodak and Fujifilm each holding approximately 40% of the market share. The resurgence in analog photography, driven by younger photographers, educational programs, and social media trends, continues to fuel demand despite supply constraints and price volatility.

Digital camera revenue in 2024 is projected to exceed USD 24 billion, according to multiple market forecasts. This marks a significant recovery for the industry after years of decline driven by smartphone competition. While unit sales saw a modest increase from 7.8 million in 2023 to 8.3 million in 2024, the revenue growth reflects stronger pricing, demand for high-end models, and renewed interest among enthusiasts and content creators. Some reports cite a 2024 market value of USD 18.59 billion, while others project USD 24.4 billion for 2025, indicating strong momentum in 2024.

I started with 35mm in around '53 or '54 and continued with it until 2000 when I bought a Sony DSC S70. I never shot film again.

I have a Contax II now and it is a gem. But ISO 400, 36 exposures and a minimum two week turnaround. Film is nostalgic fun for me and not much more. A good digital awards my feeble efforts with great color and IQ and now, not two weeks from now.
Always do what makes sense for you and enjoy it.

I am much to fond of film to drop it. I didn't back when everyone else did and I am not going to drop it when it is starting to get a little life back in it.
 
Always do what makes sense for you and enjoy it.

I am much to fond of film to drop it. I didn't back when everyone else did and I am not going to drop it when it is starting to get a little life back in it.

I agree. We should do what pleases us. But I do not play golf with a croquet mallet. 50 years of film cured me of the "charm."

I first started in '47 with a Baby Brownie, graduated to a Brownie Hawkeye and was doing my own developing and printing from about 8 years of age and for about six more years after a transition to a Vito II 35mm. I burned through the 100' rolls of Tri-X loading my own cartridges. And I spent many 8 hour Saturdays in a room lighted by a single red bulb.

But while some are thrilled to do film I demur and am thrilled to not do film. And while the analog shooters limn the praises of the medium I look at it as akin to being pleased to have a car with a crank start. Yes, I had a car with a crank start but the electric starter always worked, thankfully. The crank on this gem was inserted under the bottom chevron in the grill.

L1003433 by West Phalia, on Flickr
 
I agree. We should do what pleases us. But I do not play golf with a croquet mallet. 50 years of film cured me of the "charm."

I first started in '47 with a Baby Brownie, graduated to a Brownie Hawkeye and was doing my own developing and printing from about 8 years of age and for about six more years after a transition to a Vito II 35mm. I burned through the 100' rolls of Tri-X loading my own cartridges. And I spent many 8 hour Saturdays in a room lighted by a single red bulb.

But while some are thrilled to do film I demur and am thrilled to not do film. And while the analog shooters limn the praises of the medium I look at it as akin to being pleased to have a car with a crank start. Yes, I had a car with a crank start but the electric starter always worked, thankfully. The crank on this gem was inserted under the bottom chevron in the grill.

L1003433 by West Phalia, on Flickr
It sounds like we had similar experiences growing up; mine was growing up across the Red River of the North from North Dakota on the flat plains of Northern Minnesota where the winter wind starts in Northern Canada and don't stop until it gets somewhere south of Kansas. My first car was an old VW. No crankstart unless you count having your younger brother pushing you off the road into the ditch while you "jumped the clutch" to get it started.

I started with Mom's Kodak Brownie #2, 120 Tri-X roll film and two different sized "enlargers" intended to make 4 x 6 inch postcard prints from those Brownie negatives. The camera no longer works but the cardboard enlargers are in a closet on a shelf somewhere.

I still regularly shoot my old Pentax K1000 and the Contax II that my uncle gave me. I spent a small fortune having that Contax rebuilt when the shutter finally died in the late 90s. I won't sell it because I promised my uncle I wouldn't.

But I don't play golf at all unless shooting golf balls with a shotgun counts.

I do own an old digital camera (that may be an oxymoron) and it works perfectly but my daughter says I have to use it more then two or three times a year to wear it out.
 
Last edited:
I agree. We should do what pleases us. But I do not play golf with a croquet mallet. 50 years of film cured me of the "charm."

I first started in '47 with a Baby Brownie, graduated to a Brownie Hawkeye and was doing my own developing and printing from about 8 years of age and for about six more years after a transition to a Vito II 35mm. I burned through the 100' rolls of Tri-X loading my own cartridges. And I spent many 8 hour Saturdays in a room lighted by a single red bulb.

But while some are thrilled to do film I demur and am thrilled to not do film. ...

If you prefer to not use film, no one's forcing you to. I don't understand the repeated outcry against it.
Others enjoy shooting film .. Why not just do what you like and let others do what they like?
I don't see how that hurts you.

G
 
A Jaeger‑LeCoultre Compass - with a 35mm roll-film back so I could use it!

In my six decades as a photographer, I've seen only one of these little beauties. In a secondhand camera shop in Melbourne. No 35mm film back, apparently one was never made. The listing claimed it was 9/10 mint and in working condition, tho' with some of those shops, well, one never knows.

Going price was AUD $5500. Given the Ozbuck was worth at the time about 61 US cents, for sure bargain.

Of course it got snapped up super pronto, tho' it did linger in their web listings for a few weeks...
 
It sounds like we had similar experiences growing up; mine was growing up across the Red River of the North from North Dakota on the flat plains of Northern Minnesota where the winter wind starts in Northern Canada and don't stop until it gets somewhere south of Kansas. My first car was an old VW. No crankstart unless you count having your younger brother pushing you off the road into the ditch while you "jumped the clutch" to get it started.

I started with Mom's Kodak Brownie #2, 120 Tri-X roll film and two different sized "enlargers" intended to make 4 x 6 inch postcard prints from those Brownie negatives. The camera no longer works but the cardboard enlargers are in a closet on a shelf somewhere.

I still regularly shoot my old Pentax K1000 and the Contax II that my uncle gave me. I spent a small fortune having that Contax rebuilt when the shutter finally died in the late 90s. I won't sell it because I promised my uncle I wouldn't.

But I don't play golf at all unless shooting golf balls with a shotgun counts.

I do own an old digital camera (that may be an oxymoron) and it works perfectly but my daughter says I have to use it more then two or three times a year to wear it out.

I'm with you on shooting golf balls with a shotgun...

My equivalent to your VW Beetle was a 1962 Peugeot 403, this in 1965 so it was three years old, had 12,000 miles on its odometer and several gaping holes in the floor, the effect of the rock salt the provinces in eastern Canada used on the roads in winter to melt the ice. Every time I drove over a water puddle I got a jet of water up my left leg. Not a pleasant experience.

I took that car across North America, from Halifax in Nova Scotia to Victoria in British Columbia. I did make a noble if misguided effort to do the Alaska Highway with it, but a savvy Royal Canadian Mounted Police constable hailed me off the road and pointed out that once I hit the unpaved part of that road, Peuj would disappear down the first gaping hole and likely take me with it. So I turned around and drove it down to Baja California, then eastward through the Southwest and the South back to Canada.

Only when I got back home did I have it serviced and discover I had done that entire journey on three cylinders. Which explained the amazing gas mileage, but the downside was every hill I drove up I was passed by fully loaded road transporters.

Okay. Let's return to cameras.

I've this week lucked into a stash of 100+ old 35mm and 120 films, gifted to me by the widow of a late friend who kept it in secure containers but unrefrigerated, some dating to the 1990s.

Not being one to miss such a golden opportunity, I intend to run that entire lot thru my Nikkormat FT2s and Contax G1 and do portraits of my human friends and our cats.

The results, especially in the colors, should be interesting.

As a side note, my cousin in Canada recently emailed her response to a query I made two years ago. It seems the family's 616 Kodak Box Brownie my stepdad bought in 1943, is now in the hands of my sister-in-law, my stepbrother's widow. She has no use for it but refuses to part with it. This gal made it her life's goal to get our family's entire estate, but my stepmom lived to 102 and when she passed in 2021 there was nothing left.

I did get almost all of the family's original 616 negatives when I was in Canada in 1982, so in that way I'm the one best off.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like we had similar experiences growing up; mine was growing up across the Red River of the North from North Dakota on the flat plains of Northern Minnesota where the winter wind starts in Northern Canada and don't stop until it gets somewhere south of Kansas. My first car was an old VW. No crankstart unless you count having your younger brother pushing you off the road into the ditch while you "jumped the clutch" to get it started.

I started with Mom's Kodak Brownie #2, 120 Tri-X roll film and two different sized "enlargers" intended to make 4 x 6 inch postcard prints from those Brownie negatives. The camera no longer works but the cardboard enlargers are in a closet on a shelf somewhere.

I still regularly shoot my old Pentax K1000 and the Contax II that my uncle gave me. I spent a small fortune having that Contax rebuilt when the shutter finally died in the late 90s. I won't sell it because I promised my uncle I wouldn't.

But I don't play golf at all unless shooting golf balls with a shotgun counts.

I do own an old digital camera (that may be an oxymoron) and it works perfectly but my daughter says I have to use it more then two or three times a year to wear it out.

Oleg at OKVintageCamera is your man: About Us
 
It's the good old Nikon S2 for me. I've got dozens of film cameras and had a hankering for a S3 millennium. Sold my first S2 to fund it and regretted it. Several years later I bought another S2. A decent camera but with the usual poor RF patch. I paid a handsome sum to improve it and now love it even more. If I had to keep just one it would be my fully refurbished S2!
 
Here's a bit of a contrarian opinion: you don't ever choose your "for life" gear - it chooses you. Well, you choose it, but the best-laid plans oft go awry, and sometimes even unexpected items become faithful friends, non-negotiable parts of life. And gear we buy with the loftiest of intentions just doesn't work like we hoped, or befalls some accident or workmanship failure.
 

Thread viewers

Back
Top Bottom