Of the pure point-n-shooters I had (not counting the Olympus XA, which is a rangefinder), and I've had my share -- went through another "phase" donchya know -- the Ricoh FFs, Nikon L35AF, Yashica T3... Drum roll please??? The winner is?
1. Pentax PC35AF (the NON-M version, which has a motorized film advance/rewind). Why. Unlike most point-n-shooters (that don't cost a bundle -- the Contax, the Nikon Ti etc.) this one is built rock solid of metal. ALSO it has a cracking 35/2.8 Pentax lens, accurate auto focus, YOU are control of the flash AND -- here's the big one... It is manual wind. MANUAL WIND, which means...
- it doesn't sound like coffee grinder when the film advances so it can actually be used for street photography and candids. (Whisper silent shutter...)
- NO motors to eventually die.
The Pentax PC35AF is a professional point-n-shooter. It does have one slight niggle. It uses a round thumb wheel to advance the film -- a concession to keep the size down. This is also the smallest (and heaviest) of the point-n-shooters listed.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Nikon L35AF -- same as above. 35/2.8. You control the flash, sadly has motor-driven film advance and rewind. However, it doesn't automatically rewind when a roll is finished, you have to flick a switch. Sonnar (not Tessar lens design -- but I couldn't see a difference. Truth be told I thought the Pentax lens was better). Also this lens vignettes. Filter threads! Very cool design -- quite Leica-like but made of pure plastic, unlike the Pentax. Has backlight adjustment button. Mine was $1.00 with a broken battery door, which I fixed. These are cheap enough and it's such a coo' camera that I'll live with the motor.
3. Konica C35 AF and AF2. This camera is of note as it was the first mass produced AF camera. Little difference between the AF and AF2 versions. Ticks all the boxes (see list below). Has an old school film advance. (The Pentax has a thumb wheel like disposable cameras...) Has a 38mm/2.8 instead of a 35mm. Built like crap but takes nice pics. Yashica (and Minolta iirc) made similar ones but they're harder to find. This is the cheapest option -- Konica sold a boatload of these things. Built like crap but takes nice pics.
For point-n-shoots I have come to insist on the following:
1. An f2.8 lens
2. A MANUAL film advance and rewind (Nikon the exception here).
3. YOU control when the flash goes off.
4. CHEAP (I DO NOT trust the electronics -- especially the motors, in these things. The electronics WILL die. The motors WILL die. These things are ancient by now...)
This drastically limits your selection. Drastically. The Pentax feels like a "real" camera not a piece of crap. "Somewhat" hard to find but not outrageously priced (at least mine didn't cost too much $40-ish I think I paid but that was years ago...)
If it doesn't tick the boxes above? Keep'em. Keep'em all. These are actually great little cameras. The Pentax is outstanding, imo. But the cheap Konica will surprise you. The Nikon is cool looking but doesn't live up to the "Pikaichi" hype.