Nick De Marco
Well-known
Im about to go tomorrow
I'm taking the M (Typ 240) with 28 and 50mm Summicrons, and the MP with some film and a 35mm Summicron.
I reckon that all I need, and will probably be all I take, but my latest blog is a muse on whether to add a 21 (and which one) and 90mm
Here:
http://rangefinderchronicles.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/going-to-china-21s-and-90.html
I'm taking the M (Typ 240) with 28 and 50mm Summicrons, and the MP with some film and a 35mm Summicron.
I reckon that all I need, and will probably be all I take, but my latest blog is a muse on whether to add a 21 (and which one) and 90mm
Here:
http://rangefinderchronicles.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/going-to-china-21s-and-90.html
jenquest
Well-known
A highly interesting read. I look forward to the results and have a safe trip.
Harry S.
Well-known
I spent 6 weeks in China in 2011. I took a 5Dmk2 and 35mm f/1.4. Thats it. Wider might have been nice at times but I was never left wanting. Have fun!
asiafish
Established
28, 35 and 50 should have you covered for just about anything.
35mmdelux
Veni, vidi, vici
reckon you got it covered - where it me 21, 35 -- enjoy -
ZeissFan
Veteran
Sometimes, you can take too many lenses. I often traveled with a 35-50-135 kit. I know that the 135 length doesn't always get a lot of respect, but I liked that length when traveling.
pepeguitarra
Well-known
Take just one lens, a 35/1.4
rwintle
Scientist by day
Went to the UK a few weeks ago. Took a DSLR (Nikon DX, so 1.5 crop) and three lenses. Usage ended up like this:
Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G - about 85% [this is about normal on DX]
Sigma 10-20 - about 10% [still pretty darn wide on DX, equivalent of 15-30]
Nikkor 55-300 - about 5% [long, equivalent of about 82-450]
Next time I might not bother with the long zoom for this kind of (mainly sightseeing and people/relatives photography) trip. Traveling light, I only take the 35.
Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G - about 85% [this is about normal on DX]
Sigma 10-20 - about 10% [still pretty darn wide on DX, equivalent of 15-30]
Nikkor 55-300 - about 5% [long, equivalent of about 82-450]
Next time I might not bother with the long zoom for this kind of (mainly sightseeing and people/relatives photography) trip. Traveling light, I only take the 35.
Last edited:
Clark.EE
Well-known
Push the boundaries
Push the boundaries
Take 1 focal length. 35 by preference.
Push yourself. You may be surprised at the results?
Push the boundaries
Take 1 focal length. 35 by preference.
Push yourself. You may be surprised at the results?
mdwsta4
Matty Westside
To me 28 and 35 have always been too close together. I'd take 35 and 50 or 28 and 50 if you want a little more separation between focal lengths. One lens on each camera. Minimal hassle, minimal gear to tote around, less choices you have to worry about.
raytoei@gmail.com
Veteran
i recently spent 5 days in japan,
i didn't want to spend the time
worrying about which focal length,
however I also didn't want to
go with only one camera, just in
case it failed on me. For the
trip, I took the IIIf and M6
and two 35mm lenses, and
20+ rolls of film.
raytoei
i didn't want to spend the time
worrying about which focal length,
however I also didn't want to
go with only one camera, just in
case it failed on me. For the
trip, I took the IIIf and M6
and two 35mm lenses, and
20+ rolls of film.
raytoei
DanBachmann
Newbie
21mm, 35mm & 50mm for me
21mm, 35mm & 50mm for me
I'm just back from Japan and Korea (just 4 days in Seoul). I brought along a 21mm, 35mm, 50mm and 75mm for the Leica (and picked up a Canon A-1 SLR along the way with a collection of lenses from 35mm-500mm along the way, but that's another story).
I was glad to have all the lenses, but found that most of the time I was using the 50mm, switching to the 21mm occasionally. When I was hiking with a few others for a day in Korea and needed to be quick and light, the 35mm was perfect. It was also great in the city. I could have swapped the less frequently used 75mm for a 90mm or space in my bag.
Of my ~45 shots for Japan, here was my breakdown:
21mm 5x
35mm 12x
50mm ~25x
75mm 4x
You can see the shots here with focal lengths: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbachmann/tags/Japan+Leica+2013
I've not yet sorted through Korea yet, but I would guess it is the same breakdown. What I also suspect is your trip will be very different than mine since I was mostly visiting friends/family.
I'm glad I brought all these lenses - and I see you have decided to bring them all. Let's see what you come up with!
21mm, 35mm & 50mm for me
I'm just back from Japan and Korea (just 4 days in Seoul). I brought along a 21mm, 35mm, 50mm and 75mm for the Leica (and picked up a Canon A-1 SLR along the way with a collection of lenses from 35mm-500mm along the way, but that's another story).
I was glad to have all the lenses, but found that most of the time I was using the 50mm, switching to the 21mm occasionally. When I was hiking with a few others for a day in Korea and needed to be quick and light, the 35mm was perfect. It was also great in the city. I could have swapped the less frequently used 75mm for a 90mm or space in my bag.
Of my ~45 shots for Japan, here was my breakdown:
21mm 5x
35mm 12x
50mm ~25x
75mm 4x
You can see the shots here with focal lengths: http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbachmann/tags/Japan+Leica+2013
I've not yet sorted through Korea yet, but I would guess it is the same breakdown. What I also suspect is your trip will be very different than mine since I was mostly visiting friends/family.
I'm glad I brought all these lenses - and I see you have decided to bring them all. Let's see what you come up with!
YYV_146
Well-known
Wow, and I used to go out carrying a 5-lens kit in Beijing...
I agree, 35 is probably the most versatile for travel photography. I'd also take a 75-90 for safe measures, and an AF camera just in case you want yourself to be in front of something - the casual passerby usually can't handle MF.
I agree, 35 is probably the most versatile for travel photography. I'd also take a 75-90 for safe measures, and an AF camera just in case you want yourself to be in front of something - the casual passerby usually can't handle MF.
Nick De Marco
Well-known
I'm back now. The one thing I am glad about was I took the 90mm in the end. Ended up using it, along with the 28mm, most times. Should not have taken the MP though. Only enough time for one camera.
Nick
Nick
Tin
Well-known
I was on a China trip a few months ago to Shanxi and Hebei Provinces, and all I took was the Fuji XE-1 and the 18-55 zoom (28-85 equiv.) I never felt that I was short in any coverage, even though that is my only Fuji lens at this time.
Takkun
Ian M.
Up until June, I only had a 35 and a 90. For most street shooting, it was perfect. Though I prefer the look of my 50mm, 35 is my go-to generally.
However, if I was traveling extensively, I'd probably go with the 28/50/90, since I would like the extra wide reach.
Nice to know I'm not the only one with a 135. I've taken to using it extensively for architectural details and candid portraits of strangers (oh no, am I turning into one of those guys that gets as far away from possible from his subject?)
However, if I was traveling extensively, I'd probably go with the 28/50/90, since I would like the extra wide reach.
Nice to know I'm not the only one with a 135. I've taken to using it extensively for architectural details and candid portraits of strangers (oh no, am I turning into one of those guys that gets as far away from possible from his subject?)
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.