Trius said:
Whatcha going for now, Dave? 😉
I was eyeing Tom's CL.. and considered letting go of my IIIc and screw mount elmar and summaron. Then I realized I got enough gear
😀 ( for now . . . )
Civility has always been a hallmark of RFF.
I agree with Tom that it does not mean, because RFF has grown in size, that such things as "gentlemanly manners" have to go by the wayside.
The only thing I find frustrating is the rather blunt comments that seem to be made by folks who may be "new" to using this method of communication; that is, forums and the internet.
Many don't bother to use one of the best forum search tools around that we have here. Try doing the searches here and then see if you can do the same at Fredmiranda or any other site - good luck !! Yet people don't use the search tool so we do, inevitably, end up with multiple threads on the same topic. I recognize this; understand it, and don't usually enter into reading or responding to those threads.
The recent spate of M8 threads does get a bit tiresome; from both sides of the coin. Those that worship the M8 like it was divine providence as well as those that denigrate it seem to feel the need to do so very regularly. This does, as other members have suggested, happen often with digital bodies. To me, I am, and always will be, happy to use film in my M2 and M7 and currently have no desire for a digital M because to me, as many of you know, it's not JUST about images coming out of the camera; it's the entire photographic experience; and that's why I am on RFF and why I am a member here.
It's good to see that Leica is trying to make amends for something that should have been dealt with before releasing the camera. I hope this settles things for those out there that have purchased the body and that it doesn't further hinder sales of the M8.
Dave