whats really improved your photography ?

Jarvis said:
The rule of thirds as mentioned before by fedzilla and Ruben .... originates from Leonardo Da V.'s time (Pi) and is practiced, and has been by most photographers.
I belong to a fotoclub and when presenting a picture, however good it is, if the rule of thirds doesn't apply it's bombshelled into the cellar. this has caused me to not use the rule of thirds anymore and try and creat interesting pictures around it. It works for landscapes I must admit, but in other fields it can become pretty boring ....

Jarvis,
from da Vinci comes the "Golden Cut", which is a different rule ,more 4 to 5 , there are numerous links in the web about it's definition.

The rule of the thirds might be a derivative, I always have it in my mind when I compose a land- or cityscape. Imho you should not give it up because of the guys in the club.

But I admit the most exciting photos are those which achieve a perfect balance and harmony together with a certain tension without following any rule. VERY difficult tho !! The true master can do it.

Best,
Bertram
 
cp_ste-croix said:
the one thing that has caused the greatest improvement for me is practicing thinking and seeing photographically, even when i don't have a camera.


Ditto, and don't forget to live life..

Cheers!
 
Last edited:
My contact sheets. The camera doesn't matter too much. i could use a rf, slr, or autofocus tank set on program and still get the same shot - same sort of action between the ol index finger and shutter button.
 
Taking a beginning photo class at a local junior college.

This made me re-learn all the things i have known about photography starting in high school 25 years ago. It also gave me "assignments", reasons to take photos I would not normally be led to take. I'm improving some, and will continue to take more classes, as I seem to need an assignment, a clear direction or goal to strive for.
 
What realy improved my photography was a Canon Powershot G1 and a D60 later, and reading lots of webpages 🙂

I learned more in one year with a dSLR than the 20 something befor.
 
Computers. Seriously!

I was thinking digital, film, SLR, rangefinder or some other categories of tools that made the most difference in the way I worked and saw and decided it was computers that really made the difference. I can open digital files. I can scan film. I have replaced my darkroom with a laptop. The images are there to see and edit and I work more with them than I could in the past. The computer is a seeing tool for me. It is a light table and archive and access to a gallery.

On the shooting end any improvement has to do with taking time and better seeing and less with the particular camera used, though it helps to have access to the right tools.

John
 
Discovering Platon's portrait work (www.platonphoto.com/index.html), listen to Mary Ellen Mark speak at World Press Photo, World Press Photos, instructed by James Fee (www.JamesFee.com), and had a sit down with Chris Buck (www.ChrisBuck.com). All has help me figure out what I would like to do and what I like to shoot. Shooting a crap load of film with a RF/manual/4x5 cameras has help a great deal too. I definitely have more keepers now with film than I did with digital. Digital made me lazy and my photography actually went down hill. After discovering this forum, I stored away my D1x and purchased a RF and never looked back. This forum and people has helped a great deal too.
 
Squat! That's my trick! 🙂

When I photograph, I consciously avoid shooting from a standing position, so I go down on my knees if I can. It's just an unusual angle but it can turn an ordinary object into something new.

Same with tilting the camera to the right or left.

And, of course, looking at other's work. I'm still looking to reproduce Rich Silfverberg's "over the shoulder" shots. You know... imitation as flattery...
 
Using a camera that made me have to think about what I was shooting. Being digital for the past 5 years made it all to easy for me to really not have to think about what was in front of the camera, I could always take 50 shots of the same thing and then tweak one I liked in PS. The first 3 rolls I shot with my RF were either a disaster or really nice, it's going to take a minute for me to get my 'focus' back.
 
What has improved my photography?
...nothing?...

But I can imagine that I may improve, and that counts for something. Someone mentioned intuitition and I feel that is a good point. The thing about intuition is that you can't decide to be intuitive can you 🙂 ?

So many interesting points made here. This is a very educative thread.

Joe, you have a way of making things sound funny. Like with the editor thing. As John says, computers yeah! Without them, I woulnd't know of RFF or of practically any of the (photography) books that I have read either. I guess the only such book that I have ever got hold of without having seen some mention of it on the web is a book called 'the photographed cat'. Small digression: I see that there are many people here fond of cats. You must check this book out. It includes pictures by such luminaries as HCB, Kertesz. Orkin and many others. Looks like an old book though.

Jarvis, your words ring true ... "Try not always to think of the next item you will purchase, it's not the hardware that matters, build up a relationship with excisting stuff, give it a chance". Now if only I could build relationships with existing people 🙁 . At least I must try with cameras, they're a lot easier 😀 . I also like your point about finding most of your requirements around where you live. I wish I could do that. I have some ways of rationalizing with this however. One thing is familiarity. That always seems to take something away from the whole thing. Can't quite nail it down. The other is that I always feel more free and unhindered in a strange place, where I know no one and no one knows me.

Glad to read about all your thoughts.
 
RML said:
Hoot, I find that the meter in my Bessa L, Besa R and Leitz Minolta CL are pretty accurate.
Yeah, I might have been metering wrong. Dunno what I'm doing differently now, but at the moment, my incident meter is in perfect agreement with most of my in-camera light meters. All this comparing business has been good practice for metering with my eyes, too. 😀

You know, perhaps the reason it improved my photography wasn't purely technical, after all. Just because metering more deliberately may not have had an effect on viewfinder composing (which I've always taken pains over), I suppose it did remind me that even though photographs consist of ideas, on another level they consist of LIGHT. Ignoring this fact will usually lead to a misrepresentation of the ideas behind a photograph.
 
Jarvis said:
I find that you can (should be able to) take all the shots you either want or need within a 10 Km radius of your home. If not you have to train the eye in order to do so ...

About 80% of all my photos, and there are quite a lot, are taken within this appr. 10 Km radius
You're in good company. If I recall correctly, it was Imogen Cunningham who said that a great photographer should be able to create a masterpiece in their own back yard.
 
anand,

i try to add a bit of humour when possible.
i was , however, serious about having an editor.

i have no editor now and i think it impacts my shooting.
i often don't like any of my pics after a shoot and in the old days after making a contact sheet, i would be get very down and not print anything.
my wife at the time was an artist/photographer with a phenomonal eye. she would take my contact sheet and after a short study would circle several shots and tell me to print them.
i would mumble and grumble my way back into the darkroom and start to print.
soon i would be thinking that this shot wasn't SO bad, and then after some more work i started to really like this shot and feel good about it.
it was the editor who ordered me back into the darkroom that did it for me.
same shot - before editing - was crap - after editing not so bad>ok>pretty good>i like it!

worked for me...
joe
 
Buying a digital camera and going through 10000 shots in a few months for me 😛 (sorry about mentioning digital here, I'll say three "hail Adams'" and have two bloody maries 😀)
 
Learning about effective composition by studying the paintings of great representational artists and illustrators such as Winslow Homer, Maxfield Parrish, and Howard Pyle.
 
Gordon Coale said:
The thing that improved my photography the most was a drawing class. Drawing teaches you to see.

Gordon,

I agree that learning to draw is very valuable. I studied drawing with a very old woman in Budapest and learned a lot sketching from life and making my own drawings after the old masters like Caravaggio.

Cheers,

Sean
 
Back
Top Bottom