peepete77
Established
Yes, and it's the best feeling!!! I feel like I have really found "my space" at the www!!! 😉Hehe, that's what RFF does for you 😉
Yes, and it's the best feeling!!! I feel like I have really found "my space" at the www!!! 😉Hehe, that's what RFF does for you 😉
the 35/2 Summicron is the so-called "Bokeh King." so-called, because everyone's opinion is different on this. i personally prefer the Lux pre-asph's bokeh over the Cron IV.
a lot of sellers list this as the v. IV has such the rep. if not, you can tell by the serial number.
i personally have the first version of this and love it and i believe there is one for sale in the classifieds here. i checked out all the versions and this was the one that floated my boat. like i said, everyone is different.
your best bet is to go through here or flickr and see what lenses draw you in. figure out how much money you're willing to spend, how fast you need it to be, and whether size matter...
and, to throw another wrinkle in the bunch, the Leica 35mm Summaron is a very sweet lens. a tad slow, but nice small, and you can find it for quite a bit less than a Cron usually.
yes, the summaron 35/2,8 is an excellent performer. it has a recessed front lens which allows you to shoot it w/o a hood most of the time; it is quite resistant to flare. Here is a sun-drenched shot I took with the Summaron 35/2,8, a truly great lens for all seasons 😉 It is an excellent lens if you can live with the f/2,8. Delightful character....so compact.
![]()
Cool, so you don't necicerally agree that the Cron IV pre asph is the Bokeh king, then? 😉I have the chance to own the 35mm Summilux ASPH, 35mm Summicron 4th version, and 35mm Summilux pre asph. My favourite is the Summilux Pre asph. IMHO, the Summicron v4 bokeh is not amazing. The Summilux preasph bokeh is nicer.
About the Summilux ASPH ( which is considered by lot of people as the best 35mm lens ), it's too clinical/modern for my tastes
Peepete77,
I think you should look through some threads here - many about Noktons, SUmmicrons, etc. Than look at some pics made with lenses that interest you and see which you like.
From my experience : CV Ultron - very good lens - best balance for the money. CV Nokton 35/1.2 - best 35 mm there is - if someone says otherwise - they didnt use it enough or at all. Some other lenses come close, but nothing matches or betters it. Price to pay - it's weight and size. I have no problem with it. Plus I dont think it's that big and that heavy. here is a how it compares to a smallish UC-Hexanon 35/2. :
![]()
![]()
Both lenses cv35/1.2 and Uc-Hex are great but have different signature - reason I have both. Here is Nokton at 1.2:
![]()
and here is uc-hex at f2:
![]()
Either one of these will set you back about $1000 USD. UC-Hex - very hard to find lens - only 1000 made.
So, good luck!
On Summicron 35mm f2.0 IV (7-element):
I love this lens, but it's not THE king of bokeh to me.
It's not THE king of bokeh to me, but I love this lens.
------
On Nokton 35mm f1.2:
As much as I enjoying the lightweight of the compact lenses like the Cron IV, I have no problem at all hanging a Nokton 35/1.2 + the camera on my neck all day, or point it to the "subject" I want to shoot.
This lens is great by itself; there's nothing like it if you want that character (not even a Noctilux and that's why I keep both).
In my own experience, if I really don't want the "subject" aware that I'm taking a shot of him/her, I would:
(1) Just take out the tiny Minolta TC-1. Can't get smaller and better than that.
(2) Shoot from the hip. I failed a lot though.... 😛
the uc-hexanon is nothing like the m-hexanon. more on the uc-hexanon from the always informative dante stella.
http://www.dantestella.com/technical/hex352.html
The 35mm pre-asph Summicron is a lovely lens. I have the 3rd version. I would though suggest that for use on the R-D1 you try to check the lens on the camera before buying. My lens focuses perfectly on my M4, but slightly front focuses on the R-D1, which has a properly adjusted rangefinder. I also tried a friends IVth version which gives the same problem. It's not by much, but is limiting at apertures of f2.8 and wider close up, so I now tend to use the 40mm Nokton more.
I do though prefer the look/bokeh of the Summicron to the Nokton and slightly more the 3rd than the IVth, but the IVth is sharper at full aperture.
Clearly other people have not had the same problem problem with these lenses on the R-D1, but I would suggest you make sure the combination works for you before purchase.
Wise advice.It seems you are new to RF photography, in which case I'd recommend to buy a used 35mm Skopar, an inexpensive, small, light, easy to focus, excellent performer. Reselling it later to "upgrade" will not be a problem...
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, what pair of lenses you have man! I envy you truly! You are very lucky my friend, and I love the look of both your pictures. It really stands out, and I can agree to much of what you're saying! I suppose you're not into selling the little Haxanon? 😉
You have very much opened my eyes here, and given me more to chew on!!! I would LOVE to see more of your pictures!
Best wishes from Norway!
Yes, it was my lucky day 9/8/2008 😀 😀 😀 😀 😀A UC-Hexanon just popped up in the classifieds. Hurry up, this might be your lucky day !
I love super fast, bright lenses (I have several Canon L primes at f/1.2 and f/1.4) so when I first started looking into RF gear, I was all over that 1,2/35 Nokton. In the end I decided to go with the 2/35 Biogon. Why? I got into RF for two reasons primarily... To shoot film again with high quality gear but also to reduce the bulk and weight. The Biogon is stupid-sharp, has excellent bokeh and is reasonably small/light.