mdspace
Established
Which one and why.
Up 'til a month ago it was an R3A - a fine camera with a great finder, it's only shortcoming being that it wasn't a Leica.
The M3 stayed, the R3A went, and a Rolleiflex SLX took its place. So... once it was an R3A, now it's none of 'em.
In my case it's because I now shoot mainly medium format. The few 35mm cameras I've kept have to be a little bit special in order to stay, both in terms of how they handle and perform, and of their feeling of quality. The Leicas are, so is the OM-2N, the Pentax MX, the Konica IIIA, the then Nikon F2 (now F3HP)... the R3A was a very competent camera, but it never really wormed its way into my heart. The SLX that replaced it makes me smile every time I pick it up.When I first got my R3A I used it constantly and was amazed at just how good it was ... fifteen or so rolls of film later I got bored with it, sold it, and went back to using my M2 or Zeiss Ikon.
I still haven't quite worked out why this happened yet? 😕
I've got an R2a , because its the one i bought used fairly cheap