Which first lens for M8?

A

ambientmick

Established
Local time
11:27 AM
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
61
I'm getting an M8 very shortly and want opinions on which is the best overall lens I should get. I want it for general street type shooting. The 2 I've been looking at are the Elmarit 28mm f2.8 aspheric and the Leica Summarit 35mm F2.5. They are around the same price. This will the only lens I can afford for some time (except maybe a vc 50 1.5) so it's important I make the right choice. I know this kind of question is asked often but it is a lot of money:eek: Thanks for your opinions.
 
Both are fine lenses.
Of course, you could also look at some of modern offerings by CV and Zeiss. You could, for example, pick up the Zeiss 35/2 biogon and 50/2 planar for roughly the same price as either of those Leica lenses.

You can't really go wrong on this unless you try really hard.
 
Michael,

I suggest you check out www.reidreviews.com

Sean Reid has covered off most of the lenses from most of the manufacturers.

There are those who will argue contrary, but CV lenses really are great value for money, as are Hexanon and Zeiss.

The first question is what focal length would you normally shoot if you picked up a prime - if 50, then you need a 35, if 35 then you need a 28 etc.

In 35 you have so many choices - the new CV 35 F1.4 or the CV 35 F2.5 pancake, the Hexanon M 35 F2 or the Hexanon 35 F2 UC, the Zeiss Biogon 35 F2 (never used this, but those who have seem to rate it very highly), all for a fraction of a recent Leica 35. If I were making this choice based on what I know it would be the Hexanon 35 (either version) and Hexanon 50, but there are no bad choices.

Good luck with your decision.

Best
 
ambientmick said:
This will the only lens I can afford for some time (except maybe a vc 50 1.5) so it's important I make the right choice.
Click to expand...
There is never a "right choice" if you know what you want. It will always be the "wrong choice" if you don't know what you want.

You'll have to know what you want, what you expect, what your budget is, and then whether you are looking for a particular look and/or application.

Many people get more hung up on brands than images.

Sometimes a brand is a guide to what is already known about their offerings. Sometimes it's a distraction.

Price, however, trumps accessibility.
 
Get two lenses and get another battery pack. I would get the CV 28/1.9 Asph Ultron and a coded adapter. It's fast and sharp and you might be able to find one used. Then get the ZI 50/1.5 and have it tweaked for coding. Use the left over money to buy an extra battery pack or perhaps some lens hoods.

IMHO a much better kit than the single Solms glass. The only reason I do not say the ZI 28 is because of speed. Faster is better in a two lens kit.

B2 (;->
 
Gid said:
Michael,

I suggest you check out www.reidreviews.com

Sean Reid has covered off most of the lenses from most of the manufacturers.

There are those who will argue contrary, but CV lenses really are great value for money, as are Hexanon and Zeiss.

The first question is what focal length would you normally shoot if you picked up a prime - if 50, then you need a 35, if 35 then you need a 28 etc.

In 35 you have so many choices - the new CV 35 F1.4 or the CV 35 F2.5 pancake, the Hexanon M 35 F2 or the Hexanon 35 F2 UC, the Zeiss Biogon 35 F2 (never used this, but those who have seem to rate it very highly), all for a fraction of a recent Leica 35. If I were making this choice based on what I know it would be the Hexanon 35 (either version) and Hexanon 50, but there are no bad choices.

Good luck with your decision.

Best
Click to expand...

Thanks Gid. I've had a subscription with Reid Reviews for a bit and respect his obviously knowledgeable views. In his M8 review he recommends Leica for wide angle and CV or Zeiss for longer (based on value) because of the 6 bit coding necessary at less than 50mm. That's mainly why I'm looking at the stated lenses. I know it's possible to code other lenses manually but there's one thing I haven't been able to find out. Is the 6 bit coding only relavant to jpeg capture or are the corrections applied to raws. I'm sure Sean covers this somewhere but I still haven't managed to go through his extensive commentary on the M8 and lenses.

Thanks. Michael.
 
tbarker13 said:
Both are fine lenses.
Of course, you could also look at some of modern offerings by CV and Zeiss. You could, for example, pick up the Zeiss 35/2 biogon and 50/2 planar for roughly the same price as either of those Leica lenses.

You can't really go wrong on this unless you try really hard.
Click to expand...

Thanks. Is there an easy way to code these lenses and is it really necessary?
 
BillBingham2 said:
Get two lenses and get another battery pack. I would get the CV 28/1.9 Asph Ultron and a coded adapter. It's fast and sharp and you might be able to find one used. Then get the ZI 50/1.5 and have it tweaked for coding. Use the left over money to buy an extra battery pack or perhaps some lens hoods.

IMHO a much better kit than the single Solms glass. The only reason I do not say the ZI 28 is because of speed. Faster is better in a two lens kit.

B2 (;->
Click to expand...

Thanks. The CV 28/1.9 is definite possibility. Can you explain how I would get a ZI 50 1.5 coded? Please excuse my ignorance:)
 
The CV Stephen can do the LTM adapter, version 2 I think is the right one. I would drop a note to Tony at PopFlash and see what he can do for you if you get the ZI from him. My gut tells me that he can do some magic, if not him, someone else in the general area can. I'm sorry I do not have any specifics, I looked at the Epson for a long time till I went a different way. Did a lot of thinking and what-ifs.

If you come up dry with Tony drop me a PM, I might have another source I can reach out to, but I think Tony if you buy it from him is better.

The actual coding is not hard. If they can do an LTM adapter they can remove the mount (usually about three or four screws) from the ZI lens and pop it into the same machine they use for the adapter.

B2 (;->
 
BillBingham2 said:
The CV Stephen can do the LTM adapter, version 2 I think is the right one. I would drop a note to Tony at PopFlash and see what he can do for you if you get the ZI from him. My gut tells me that he can do some magic, if not him, someone else in the general area can. I'm sorry I do not have any specifics, I looked at the Epson for a long time till I went a different way. Did a lot of thinking and what-ifs.

If you come up dry with Tony drop me a PM, I might have another source I can reach out to, but I think Tony if you buy it from him is better.

The actual coding is not hard. If they can do an LTM adapter they can remove the mount (usually about three or four screws) from the ZI lens and pop it into the same machine they use for the adapter.

B2 (;->
Click to expand...

I'm in the UK so PopFlash isn't really an option. Thanks anyway.
 
Get the Leica 28mm F2.8 asph. Elmarit and weld it on your M8. You'll love the image quality and won't have to worry about coding third party lenses. CV's are good, I own some, but I'm always glad I bought the Leica 28 when I see the images it produces.
 
ambientmick said:
I'm getting an M8 very shortly and want opinions on which is the best overall lens I should get. I want it for general street type shooting. The 2 I've been looking at are the Elmarit 28mm f2.8 aspheric and the Leica Summarit 35mm F2.5. They are around the same price. This will the only lens I can afford for some time (except maybe a vc 50 1.5) so it's important I make the right choice. I know this kind of question is asked often but it is a lot of money:eek: Thanks for your opinions.
Click to expand...


I've had excellent results with the Elmarit M 1:2.8/21mm Asph and Summilux M 1:1.4 35 Asph lenses both with my M6 and M8.

On the M6 I found I wasn't using the 21 as much, but now on the M8 its pretty much my standard lens for my street shooting resulting in an approx 28mm field of coverage. But I also love the 35. If you can afford those I'd sure recommend them but if I had to pick just 1 it would be the 21.

Good luck...

Wang'r
 
ambientmick said:
I'm in the UK so PopFlash isn't really an option. Thanks anyway.
Click to expand...

Why not? I would bet he might have a used one (or one that could be made into slightly used, say for testing) that could be tweaked and might cost you less than if you were to buy it locally. Drop Tony an email and ask. Stephen is the same way. If they shoot a picture through the lens it is used and the price (VATable) should drop.

There used to be a UK dealer who, White was it? Who I thought had ZI lenses too, if you want to stay local. But the strength of the GBP is wonderful for you right now, buying from over here should give you quite a bargain.

B2 (;->
 
BillBingham2 said:
Get two lenses and get another battery pack. I would get the CV 28/1.9 Asph Ultron and a coded adapter. It's fast and sharp and you might be able to find one used. Then get the ZI 50/1.5 and have it tweaked for coding. Use the left over money to buy an extra battery pack or perhaps some lens hoods.

IMHO a much better kit than the single Solms glass. The only reason I do not say the ZI 28 is because of speed. Faster is better in a two lens kit.

B2 (;->
Click to expand...

I agree with you about the Ultron and the JM adapter. Used that combo a month ago in SF. The big thing in looking at any lens is the field of view that meets your personal "eye". The 28mm on an M8 is something I am growing in to.
 
Michael,

I have not coded any of my lenses. 35mm and up really is not necessary from a cyan corner point of view IMHO, based on real shooting experience. I also use an uncoded 21 2.8 (Kobalux) and have no cyan problems in real world application. So, the coding basically gives you focal length in the exif. there is a program called cornerfix which is available through the LUF which fixes any problem if you find one and haven't coded your lenses. Now, if you're thinking of shooting white sheets, then, you might see something.

Best
 
I use the CV15mm unfiltered and uncoded. Whatever route you go for a first lens, I think that inexpensive little super-wide CV is a "must have" with the M8.
 
i, too, recently purchased an M8. my first lens is the elmarit 28mm. it's a great lens (sharp, very small, etc.)--and a great focal length for my style of shooting. i am, however, planning to add one more lens--a cron 50mm. those two lenses will satisfy pretty much all of my needs.
 
You have to keep in mind where you will be using the lenses. You should be fine with the 28 elmarit in England, but in Arizona and Florida, where I spend part of the year, one wouldn't want to use the more contrasty lenses (28 elmarit and CV 50 f1.5, for example). Sean Reid really points out these differences.

You can buy the version II adapter for LTM lenses from Cameraquest and send them to John Milich. John will mill the holes for the code for $25 (I believe). I used black and white nail polish and it was simple to do the coding. He will also mill Zeiss lenses, but you must remove the lens from the mount and send it to him.

Nobody can really tell you which will be best for you, but it would be hard to make a mistake among all the wonderful options.

DaveB is right about the CV 15mm. It is a wonderful bargain that really delivers.
 
Last edited:
Yeeeees I was thinking of exactly the same thing!

Yeeeees I was thinking of exactly the same thing!

I am too thinking of buying a M8 and one lens only. I already bought voightlander 35/1.2 lens But I regret. No body yet. I should have bought 35/2 ash summicron lens and m8!!!!

But now I still want 35/2 but no money so I want 35/2.5 summarit lens. I hear this series of lens are very very sharp!!! And with m8 It will become slightly wider standard lens which is perfect for me for traveling.
But If I have a choice I want 35/2 chrome with chrome M8. Beautiful looking kit! I like to play with camera.

Serious photographer shold be buying black lens and black M8!!!!

It depens on what u use m8 for. Good luck!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom