Which is better?

So, FrankS, they lose two in Montreal, then come up pretty strong in the swamp. What teases, eh? And look who comes up big ... Mats and the kids, and Aubin gets 1st star in his first start as a Leaf.
 
Earl, the Leafs, teases? They're worse than my highschool girlfriends! (back in the day)
Matts, Tucker, and the kids. Gotta love Kilger, Ondrus, Stajan, Steen, and Wellwood. Defensemen White and (in a previous game) Bell, look good.
 
are we helping this guy out or not??? 😕 😕 😕

from the advice i have been given. think the R is a really good camera to start with.
L has some limitations compared to the R.
and R is not too expensive too!
 
What would be a good 35 or 50 lens for the R? I want to keep it at 500 dollars for the body and lens. What's a troll?
 
Mark,

The consensus seems to be that the person posting as "Chico" is actually a former member with not just one, but several, axes to grind. So until there is real evidence that this is not the case, no, no one is likely to post anything that might be helpful.

So as far as it goes, I hear the Heliar 50/3.5 is a very sharp lens... 😱

William
 
Better for what? If I had to fend off an attacker I'd opt for the R. What do you intend to do?

Bob
 
rpsawin said:
Better for what? If I had to fend off an attacker I'd opt for the R. What do you intend to do?

Bob
to find off an attacker use a KIEV 60, swing from the hips and make sure you follow through [it is best to use an after market strap or you may LAUNCH the camera clean over the attacker and end up with colateral damage to some poor smuck just passing by 😀
 
What's the L good for?

Words like lonely, loony, lunatic, loose (as in "loose canon"), loopy and louse.

And the R?

Useful for words like rash, rude, ridiculous, rickety, risible and rocky.

There you go! 🙂
 
Back
Top Bottom