Which RAW processor for M9?

nightfly

Well-known
Local time
5:00 PM
Joined
Apr 21, 2006
Messages
1,986
Have had an M9 for awhile and have always used Lightroom. I have one of the last stand alone versions (Lightroom 4) as I'm just sorta morally opposed to renting core software.

However I feel like there is a little more in my RAW files than I'm seeing.

What RAW procesor do you like for the M9? Newer version of Lightroom (bite the bullet and get CC), Capture One, Irident, RPP (this one would be a stretch as UI is so primitive).

Just feel like there is a little more sharpness and better color rendition in there. I generally like Lightroom's file management, just wondering if I can improve my images that extra 10%.
 
I use Photoshop with the Camera Raw plugin. I prefer my own filing system, and just never managed to settle in with Lightroom or Aperture. I really like the ease of Photoshop, especially as I've logged so many hours with it. I used Capture One when I first got the M8, but quickly settled on Photoshop/Camera Raw. I use CS6.
 
I used to use Photoshop with my own file naming convention (based on the DAM book) when I was shooting a lot of film and scanning.

When I started shooting more digital I switched to Lightroom and I don't think I'd go back.

Not as concerned with the organization as with the actual RAW conversion. Seems like there might be better options that Adobe's solution.

Will probably just download a trial copy of C1 and play with it myself.
 
Over years I have grown to use SOOC. Quality sensor and good lens with correct exposure gives the best. IMO. I have LR 6, which seems to be standalone. I have it with new M-E as download.
 
I am reasonably happy to use Lightroom for basic processing but run both Nik software and Corel Paint Shop Pro as plug-ins running under it for anything more than basic conversions. Lightroom is simply not capable of the sort of post processing I usually perform.
 
Photoshop cc works for my M8 & 9.

I don`t seem to get the hang of catalogs, but I am sure I could get it if I chose to spend a lot of time. ACR seems to work quite well.
 
I don`t seem to get the hang of catalogs...

+10. I really disliked having the software decide that stuff for me. I know where the file is, and know how to find it. Maybe I just have too many images for that system to fit.😕

EDIT: I've been corrected. Lightroom didn't decide anything for me, it just kept meticulous records of every click I made? Anyway it did way more than I needed. I'm simple. 🙂
 
Have had an M9 for awhile and have always used Lightroom. I have one of the last stand alone versions (Lightroom 4) as I'm just sorta morally opposed to renting core software.

There is LR 5 standalone and LR 6 standalone. We still don't know if there will be no LR 7 standalone.
 
+10. I really disliked having the software decide that stuff for me. I know where the file is, and know how to find it. Maybe I just have too many images for that system to fit.😕

I don't get this. LR works with any file structure you have or want to have. It does not force you into a structure of your images you don't want. The is only the restriction that you are not absolutely free where the catalog itself is located. Or do you think that the images are inside the LR catalog? They are not.
 
LR 5 and LR cc seem pretty good with M9. I use Picasa (u can still find it) to browse my edited RAWS- which I export as Jpegs. This keeps me from scrolling around too much in LR, as it is not the greatest for that.

10 bucks a month for LR and PS is not a bad deal. Two good beers a month LOL

But there may be better options, and I love to hear what everyone likes best 🙂

I have better things to do with my limited time than edit, which is one reason I love M9 🙂
 
I don't get this. LR works with any file structure you have or want to have. It does not force you into a structure of your images you don't want. The is only the restriction that you are not absolutely free where the catalog itself is located. Or do you think that the images are inside the LR catalog? They are not.

I always ended up with multiple versions of images with Lightroom. Granted I haven't tried it since LR2, which I loaded and IIRC I had trouble integrating with my LR1 catalog/library. A long time ago, and I never looked back. PS/ACR (and Bridge) do everything I need in a (for me) very straightforward fashion.

EDIT: I've been corrected, this was not what happened, however, I still don't like Lightroom.
 
Lightroom or Photoshop, the Adobe Camera raw processor is the exact same thing. Just arranged a little differently and I also do like the freedom and putting files where I want to put them using Photoshop. I need no "village" keeping me straight on where things are.

The raw profiles Huelight sells for the M9 are rather good too. Multiple color options and a great monochrome option.
 
+10. I really disliked having the software decide that stuff for me. I know where the file is, and know how to find it. Maybe I just have too many images for that system to fit.😕

LR decides nothing for you.

LR Catalog = a diary of every rendering and display change you made to an original file.

LR Library Panel= a virtual display of how the original folders/files are organized on your HD.

Catalogs have no direct relationship "with where the file is".

The LR Library tells you exactly where and how the images are located on your HD. In LR the files on your HD are virtually mapped to the LR Library Panel. Your OS determines where the folder/files located. LR just adopts your existing file organization[1]. Adding (Import) new images creates new folders/files on your HD. You always know exactly where the original images are located. The limit to how many images can "fit" is determined only by the limits of your HD storage space.

The Catalog can be understood if you think of it as a diary. Every change you make to an image is recorded in the Catalog. This means the original files are never irreversibly modified. It also means it is necessary to have a back up of the LR Catalog. I have two real-time back ups and two more recent back ups. One disadvantage of the Catalog is over time it can become very large.

In LR you can make virtual copies. These do not exist as files on the HD. Virtual copies do not exist in the Catalog either. When you view a virtual copy, LR goes to the Catalog; finds all the rendering and display parameters you once applied to that un-rendered image; and displays a version rendered with those parameters. Even if you don't use a virtual copy LR does the same thing. The advantage of virtual copies is you can save and compare different renderings for the original image.

[1] This one-to-one mapping has one consequence. After you start using LR, you should only reorganize, move or create new image folders using the drop and drag features of the LR Library Panel[2]. These changes physically change your HD organization via background OS commands executed by LR. The LR Library and the OS Folder/file organization are always identical.

[2] If you move folders and, or files just using the OS, LR will lose track of them. It is possible to teach LR where you moved the Folders and, or files. This can be very tedious if you decide to use the OS, instead of LR, to make significant organizational changes.
 
Have to agree with what William says above about LR CC and file management. When I bought my M-E that came with a free copy of LR I took the time to learn it and moved away from Apple Aperture. I also purchased and follow George Jardine's Lightroom Library and Workflow techniques. (George is well known for his managing role on the original development team for Adobe Photoshop Lightroom.)

For those that want to try out the Color Fidelity Huelight profiles for the Leica M9 can find them here: http://www.colorfidelity.com/leica.htm
 
Back
Top Bottom