Who actually uses 1/8000 of sec?

Interesting question, so too, do you use the light meter LEDs... OK, so I'm an "incident" lighting sort, but...

Yes, to speeds 2000, 4000, and 8000 and light meter LEDs: they're there, let's use 'em.
At ISO 2500 with 4000 or 8000 in daylight I can get some "nope-no-film-like" source data that obviates post-proc, er, "methods".

I use the LEDs because, sniff, there ain't no EV adjustment wheel, sob! Oh, the horror!

rgds,
Dave
 
Having 1/8000 sec. means that your 1/4000 and 1/2000 speeds will be accurate. (Usually the fastest speed on a camera is a little slow.) That's one advantage of having such fast speeds.

I rarely use 1/8000 sec. on any of the cameras I have that support it (and I have a few, all Nikons: F4s, F5, N8008s, F90x, F100), but it's nice that it's there.

The lack of it certainly wouldn't quench my interest in an otherwise capable camera, but the lack of 1/250 flash synch certainly might.
 
Now that you mention it. . . .

Now that you mention it. . . .

Benjamin Marks said:
Are there a lot of you who routinely use 1/8000 or 1/4000? So: 1/8000 (1/4000 if applicable). Who among us actually uses their camera's top speed? If so, how often? Routinely? Inquiring minds want to know. With curiosity, Ben Marks

I think I've shot at 1/8000th . . . once. Most of my shooting is at 1/30th, 1/60th, 1/125th, or 1/250th. Very little at 1/1000th, and less still at 1/2000th. Thanks for the thread--need to find more opportunities to shoot at higher speeds. 😉
 
Back
Top Bottom