Bertram2
Gone elsewhere
Oldprof said:This is nothing new. . An extreme example of this is the Leica Photography Forum on photo.net which is largely devoted to debates about equipment, which lens or body is better, etc. I think the fascination with gear is largely a male predilection. You see similar behavior when car nuts talk about their favorite automobiles, or audiophiles discuss speakers. Golfers are another example ... they love to talk about the merits of different clubs and golf balls.
Hi Oldprof
very wisely spoken ! And if there is a product which costs 3 to 5 times more than comparable products this is pure dynamite for a discussion which is always a bit
childish anyway and in principle totally OT. (Do painters talk about their brushes all the time ?) The question of prestige then is in the foreground and it gets all hopeless. The Leica owners are suspcted be boasters, the others are suspected to be envy or poor or both and so on 😀
Even on the CVUG list, which is VERY different at this point from all other lists and forums lately somebody answered a newbie's request for a recommendation this way:
"Take a 35mm cron , if you are poor take a CV Skopar". Imagine this choice of words !! If you are poor !!! Caught pants down as we say.
What makes all that really funny for me is the fact that I have not seen a decent photography ever done by this kind of folks, who are often infected by the collecting virus too.
Their photos look always as if they were shot just as a proof of their ownership, for nothing more, no further meaning.Grotesque bad P&S stuff, so poor that you cannot believe that someone dares to post such a nonsense in a gallery.
Up til today I could not find such folks her at RFF, seems this is a mined garden for them. Too much knowledge and skill? 😉