Why I switched to film...a joyous moment.

M

michaelm6

Member
Local time
12:54 AM
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
42
View My Gallery
This...this is why I switched to film. I am in love with the feel of film...so rich and full of life and character. And what a joy it is to just meter one time and then breathe. Thinking only about what's right in front of me. I love shooting this way...

I was so sick of wading through 300 frames to find 10 keepers. Digital makes snapping away so simple, and so thoughtless, that I actually would be become anxious during shoots.

I got 20 keepers out of 32 shots with my girlfriend this weekend (I had 4 shots of another person all used up). I was just able to slow down and really focus on my framing and wait for that moment. It was a joy.

M6 and Zeiss Planar f/2

In Black and White.jpg by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr


Untitled by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr


I See You... by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr


Madelena and the Pond by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr
 
Wow, beautiful shots. I love the bokeh on the second photo.

Yeah, funny with film vs digital. When I shoot a crappy or boring film shot, I think that I've wasted money. Not so with digital, but in reality, all I've done is prepaid for those crappy digital shots. For poor film shots, it is PAYGO.

Thanks for sharing your photos.

Vick
 
i shoot the same number of frames on film or digital. 🙂 i think it's really about restricting yourself, asking yourself question "will i delete this frame after i take it?" then why bother taking it. then you dont have to scroll through 300 pics. but very nice pictures! i do love films as well.
 
Lovely shots, and know what you mean. A back to basics camera with the minimal of controls seems to free me up to just see, frame and shoot, removing superfluous distractions in the shooting process for me. My digital cameras seem full of distractions, and its not really a film vs digital thing, as I would feel similarly about a feature packed film slr like an F6/ F100. As David Hurn said, it really all comes down to where you stand, and when you push the shutter 🙂
 
Most of feel the same way. With digital you just click and click with the attitude that if it isn't great you can fix it with Photoshop. With 35mm there is expense and time involved so every shot has to count, but with medium format it's even more intense. With only 12 exposures on 6x6 and only 8 with 6x9 and a lot of time and effort just to change rolls, you have to make every shot truly count. I slow down and think and then think again - exposure and focus ok? How 'bout the background? And so on - so that most of find that the percentage of keepers is higher with the larger formats.
 
tuanvinh2000 said:
i shoot the same number of frames on film or digital. 🙂 i think it's really about restricting yourself, asking yourself question "will i delete this frame after i take it?" then why bother taking it. then you dont have to scroll through 300 pics. but very nice pictures! i do love films as well.
Click to expand...

You're exactly right. I was just having an impossible time telling myself. That's why I've gone film. I need to train myself to slow down. This really helps.
 
KenR said:
Most of feel the same way. With digital you just click and click with the attitude that if it isn't great you can fix it with Photoshop. With 35mm there is expense and time involved so every shot has to count, but with medium format it's even more intense. With only 12 exposures on 6x6 and only 8 with 6x9 and a lot of time and effort just to change rolls, you have to make every shot truly count. I slow down and think and then think again - exposure and focus ok? How 'bout the background? And so on - so that most of find that the percentage of keepers is higher with the larger formats.
Click to expand...

Well said, and good point about what's going on in the rest of the frame (the background). It really does force you to slow down and really LOOK at what's going on in the frame. And exposure is so important, but so simple. With digital, I found that I was 'chasing the needle' and trying to perfect my exposures. Plus there's so much to look at in the viewfinder. All of those focus points, your ISO, your shutter and your aperture...it's almost hard to really focus on the only important thing in the finder - your subject. I love the simplicity of it all.
 
Vickko said:
Wow, beautiful shots. I love the bokeh on the second photo.

Yeah, funny with film vs digital. When I shoot a crappy or boring film shot, I think that I've wasted money. Not so with digital, but in reality, all I've done is prepaid for those crappy digital shots. For poor film shots, it is PAYGO.

Thanks for sharing your photos.

Vick
Click to expand...

Thanks a lot Vick. I agree with the whole pay per shot thing. Sort of why I associate digital with 'cheap'. Taking the shot is free. Its paid for. Film - make it count!
 
michaelm6 said:
You're exactly right. I was just having an impossible time telling myself. That's why I've gone film. I need to train myself to slow down. This really helps.
Click to expand...
Yes. It is about practice. Regardless of what theory others may promote, it is whatever practice helps you/one to realize what you know to be authentic/real
 
Trius said:
Yes. It is about practice. Regardless of what theory others may promote, it is whatever practice helps you/one to realize what you know to be authentic/real
Click to expand...

Agreed. Practice and a little push both help tremendously.

Here are a couple more from the roll..


Pretty Lady by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr


Pose.jpg by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr

slightly out of focus...but I like this shot. I'm falling in love with this little Zeiss Planar. Sharp sharp sharp...all of these are shot wide open.


You are Alive on Film by Michael Hulcher, on Flickr
 
donz said:
I like the result out of it..do u process ur film on ur own ? and scanne them ?
Click to expand...

Thank you! I had the film developed and then I scanned it with an Epson V500 to DNG. I played with exposure and white balance and then imported into PS CS6 and ran some actions that I've worked on. Mostly it just plays with levels, which I then tweak a bit. I messed with the color balance a little. I spend about 5-6 minutes per image. Just little tweaks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

underlord
Are YOU a photographer?
2 3
Replies
47
Views
2K
BillBingham2
BillBingham2
raphaellehnen
New zine! 'Carry That Weight' and the limitation as a catalyst for creation.
Replies
1
Views
194
robert blu
robert blu
T
I finally found a use for the stack of sticky notes my wife gave me.
Replies
0
Views
209
Tim Murphy
T
T
Film versus Digital, and vice versa
2 3
Replies
42
Views
4K
Tim Murphy
T
sooner
Why Blank Super Positive Film?
Replies
1
Views
562
TenEleven
TenEleven
Back
Top Bottom