Why is the Bessa III more expensive than the GF679?

I believe the Fuji is grey market here in the U.S. So, no warranty. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

Still it kinda irks me, since I probably could have waited six months to buy and would have taken the risk on the cheaper version.

Great camera either way though. Definitely worth it... to me.
 
I believe the Fuji is grey market here in the U.S. So, no warranty. Someone please correct me if I am wrong.

Still it kinda irks me, since I probably could have waited six months to buy and would have taken the risk on the cheaper version.

Great camera either way though. Definitely worth it... to me.
B&H and Adorama carry it.
The bessa3 has a different lens, so they decided price it up higher because of it?
 
B&H and Adorama carry it.
The bessa3 has a different lens, so they decided price it up higher because of it?

Nope, internally the same device - and black vs. chrome does not account for more than a two digit figure in the making either. Different marketing, that is all.
 
The Fuji GF670 and the Voigtlander Bessa III are the exact same camera except for the branding. Mechanically, everything is the same, including the lens. Adorama and B&H sell the GF670 but the warranty is serviced from Fuji Japan. Bessa III has a US warranty if my understanding is correct.
 
Thanks for correcting me.
Which mean it is not a real Heliar lens (5 elements)?

I am lucky that I gone for GF670, not bessa III.
 
Thanks for correcting me.
Which mean it is not a real Heliar lens (5 elements)?

I am lucky that I gone for GF670, not bessa III.

Same exact camera, including the lens. Just the printing on the camera and lens are different, and the color of the body.
 
Back
Top Bottom