Why a Leica?
Why a Leica?
Why a Leica one might ask?
I scoffed for years at the price, easy to do when you are a broke newspaper shooter. But then in 2006, I decided I had better try one in light of the Kodachrome Project. So I found a guy who was selling a classic M6 ( non-TTL) and 2nd version 35 Summicron for $1,700 and I went for it.
The very first thing I noticed is that I had my life back again. And what I mean by that is that I too got to witness the moment I was capturing due to no mirror black out. All those years of getting the shot meant that the only memory I had of it was the before and after and the shot it self, I personally, missed the moment.
With any rangefinder, you see in spatial relationships as the area outside the frame is also seen in the finder. This makes the R/F an exceptional tool for the "Decisive Moment" or people photography in general. If you are one to heavily quiet down "Noisy edges" with objects protruding into the frame, then at first, the R/F might annoy you with it's lack of framing precision.
But after awhile, it grows on you and you start to shoot more loosely, less contrived and controlled and you leave more up to chance than control. You just see more with a R/F camera. Needless to say, the Leica is not the best tool for architecual or landscape photography if precise framing is paramount.
I now own and use 4 Leica M cameras and 6 lenses. One M6, MP3 and two M3's. Lenses are a 15 CV, 28 F/2, 35 1.4, 50 F/2, 50 1.4 and 90 2.8. I use the 35 and the 50 1.4 the most. I will use them for life and plan to phase digital use out of my life as much as I can...I have been shooting digital for 15 years, I can live with out it for a lot of things..
So in short, the Leica M is the camera that simply but precisely gets the heck out of the way of making great photographs.