Stan98103 said:
Why do I keep looking at the Zeiss Ikon even though I have a perfectly good Contax G2 with 28/45/90 glass (that I love but don't use that often) as well as SLR gear (Nikon FE, F100 and D100 with a D200 on order)?
Because you already know how good the Zeiss glass is, from your G2 experience, but you also know that the G2's viewfinder is a bit small and doesn't let you see beyond the frame borders the way you can with a bright-line finder system. You also know that the G2's AF system, although very quick and reasonably precise, doesn't always give the same sense of knowing your exact focus point that you get when using an optical rangefinder.
Or maybe because your film-winding thumb just feels in need of exercise!
Mostly because you understand that the Ikon and the G2 are fundamentally different
types of camera, just as your G2 and FE are fundamentally different types of camera. There will be some types of photography for which you feel one is the best tool; other types for which you feel most comfortable with a different tool. Since money doesn't seem to be much of a problem, why
not acquire one if you think it will be useful?
Why don't I just get out a shoot some Tri-X with my G2 instead of staring at my computer screen and drooling on my keyboard?
Who says you can't do both? Go out and shoot some Tri-X, and
then come back and drool on the keyboard for a while.