EdSawyer
Established
having both is worthwhile.
having both is worthwhile.
I have both 43 and 50, and they are both useful for different purposes. Granted, it's not cheap but it is worth it in the long run, I think.
having both is worthwhile.
I have both 43 and 50, and they are both useful for different purposes. Granted, it's not cheap but it is worth it in the long run, I think.
hatidua
Established
I have both 43 and 50, and they are both useful for different purposes. Granted, it's not cheap but it is worth it in the long run, I think.
Agreed. Although I own all of the Mamiya 7 lenses except for the 210, I could rather happily get by with the two widest options.
kmallick
Well-known
Agreed. Although I own all of the Mamiya 7 lenses except for the 210, I could rather happily get by with the two widest options.
I thought I was the only one who got suckered into the same. Whew! I feel better now.
Bob Michaels
nobody special
I have both the 80mm and 50mm which are both wonderful lenses. I feel that the 80mm is a touch long at moments and the 50mm to be a bit too wide for some situations which leads me to believe a 65mm would be ideal compromise between them. Not to mention the price point of the 65mm is far more tempting.
I bought the 65mm after using the 80 & 50mm lenses for several years. Like Jason, I was always thinking the 80 was a bit too long and the 50 a bit too wide. I was right, the 65mm is perfect for me. I almost never use the 80 or 50 now as the 65 is always on my camera.
Share: