Will you pay $7,195 for the new 50 'cron Asph?

Consider a used Alpa Kern Macro Switar 50/1.9 Apochromatic or an used Kinoptik 100/2 APO cost today, both is over 40 years old already and a brand new Kinoptik 100/2 APO cost at 5,978 euros before tax/VAT. I think the new 50 APO-Summicron ASPH price is right between among the top tier lens manufacturers. :D
 
Apparently, Leica's pricing scheme is based on the supply-demand of the 35luxFLE.
They saw people were willing to pay $7k for the then-new 35luxFLE, so they said, why don't they charge that much to begin with.

The price point is exactly mid way between the lux and the noct. I think that's how they came up with the magical number.
 
this is just going to increase the price of the used market too, hold onto your current 50's, they are about to go up in value
 
The Pentax Super Takumar 55 is a lovely lens, screw mount. Mine came for free. This new 50 from Leica actually looks like an ugly duckling. But I like the creative points made above, especially the one about the Leica coffers getting some of what would otherwise go to Rolex and Louis Vuitton etc.
 
forgive my ignorance, but what does the apo designation actually mean? what does it translate to in actual performance / rendering?

APO= Apochromatic. A better correction of chromatic and spherical aberration than the much more common achromat lenses. The Apochromatic lens is usually of three elements and brings light of three different frequencies ( primary colors) to a common focus.
Any lens with "APO" designation is expensive except Sigma APO lenses.:bang:
 
forgive my ignorance, but what does the apo designation actually mean? what does it translate to in actual performance / rendering?

it means that when you miss focus by even a hair it wont be as sharp as the normal cron.

or at least, that was how Zeiss explained the use of the 250 superapochromat as compared to the plain sonnar version (which cost a ton less).

I wonder what the price would be from Canon for an actual equivalent (ie not a 50/2 that was "almost as good" but one that actually was)? probably still north of 5k.
 
Now I wonder why the 75mm apo cron is so cheap? Shouldn't they also increase the price of that to at least $7,595 given that 75mm is not as common as 50mm?
 
APO= Apochromatic. A better correction of chromatic and spherical aberration than the much more common achromat lenses. The Apochromatic lens is usually of three elements and brings light of three different frequencies ( primary colors) to a common focus.

Ah. Doesnt sound like it would be as big a benefit to a film m user as a digital m user then. Thanks.
 
it means that when you miss focus by even a hair it wont be as sharp as the normal cron.

or at least, that was how Zeiss explained the use of the 250 superapochromat as compared to the plain sonnar version (which cost a ton less).

I wonder what the price would be from Canon for an actual equivalent (ie not a 50/2 that was "almost as good" but one that actually was)? probably still north of 5k.

I often miss focus by a few hairs.... :|
 
I don't know, I like Leica but this is insanity. I'm sure people will buy it though
If I were into 50mm, which I'm not, I'd get the nice Zeiss 50, now literally only a fraction of the price. I don't think I'll ever buy a digital M even if I could afford it
 
No way. Who're they kidding? Leica's building monuments to honor themselves and is no longer interested in getting my vote.
 
The crazy part is, it's probably priced about right. It's not a matter of what kind of quality image it produces; it's a matter of how many they can actually manufacture and the numbers that the world will demand.
 
forgive my ignorance, but what does the apo designation actually mean? what does it translate to in actual performance / rendering?

What is probably also refers to is the fact that it might focus IR and UV light exactly the same as Visible Spectrum Light (this is my guess based on the price). This is important for some other applications (scientific and medical and stuff). With a normal lens IR light isn't focused exactly the same. Old Pentax lenses have a red marker showing how much to move the focus if you're using IR film.

Really this is probably a speciality lens that isn't needed for Normal Photography.

See lenses like the Coastal Optics 60mm f4 which costs about 5k (and is slower) http://diglloyd.com/articles/CoastalOptics60f4/index.html

Thats my guess based on the price but I guess all APO guarantees is that visible spectrum light is focused to the same point

*Correction* if it focuses things outside of the Visible Spectrum it should be called SuperAPO and would require fluorite elements at least according to Wikipedia
 
Back
Top Bottom