WIRED article on street shooting and the law

goo0h

Well-known
Local time
3:36 PM
Joined
Mar 26, 2005
Messages
692
Location
North Texas, USA
Perhaps some might find this interesting. Not really a new phenomenon, though. At least the greater the exposure of this sort of thing, the greater the chance that folks will insist on some changes. One can hope....
 
Here is a link for those who might be interested (click). Luckily I have only had one incident taking pictures at an outdoor concert. The ticket stated that cameras were allowed, but after taking a few shots a security guard camea up & warned me that my camera would be confiscated if he saw me taking any more pictures... about 1/2 an hour latter he must have been educated because he came back & said 'no flash photos'... by then the late afternoon light was gone & all hope of getting anything decent was well past.

Peter
 
I love to challenge security. But that's a youth thing as much as a 'legal obligation to obey the law and educate those who are misinformed' 😀
 
I had a rehash of just this with an attorney friend last week. One suggestion he made was to politely, in a non-confrontive tone, ask the officer exactly what law you would be breaking if you took a shot or continued to shoot?

"If an arrest is made or a summons is issued, there must be a statute cited, every officer knows that." ... was close to the exact quote.

This got me to thinking ... (dangerous, I know) ... IANAL by any means, but is it breaking any law for an officer (or a security guard) to knowingly misrepresent the law by falsely stating that something is illegal when it is not?
 
Back
Top Bottom