With all the products coming out...

J

jky

Well-known
Local time
4:04 PM
Joined
Aug 6, 2006
Messages
1,430
... I'm only wishing for one thing:

A digital TLR.

Silly?

I'd love to have an equivalent Rolleiflex 2.8f "D"...

Realistically of course - I don't see it happening, but one can wish...
 
Someone put a digital back onto their Rollei. It shouldn't be too difficult to do, if you have the digital back and some mechanical expertise.
 
jsrockit:
...just for kicks I was looking at the Phase One digital backs - I personally don't have the capital for one + it's still not a TLR. Although I am wondering if perhaps the technology is possible. I've always enjoyed my old Autocord & Rolleiflex and miss the whole TLR experience...
 
kzphoto said:
Someone put a digital back onto their Rollei. It shouldn't be too difficult to do, if you have the digital back and some mechanical expertise.
Click to expand...

...this is interesting...
But sadly, I'm very much lacking in the "mechanical expertise".
 
Funny, this question just came up yesterday in the Ricoh forum on DPR. A few responders have pulled up examples of early digital cameras with LCDs on top. One even proposed an option to reverse the image so it's upside down!
 
shadowfox said:
- *Much* bigger viewfinder (nicer too).
- No mirror movements to worry about (both from manufacturing and using standpoint)
Click to expand...


Imagine looking down on a digital 6x6?!? Plus you probably won't need a Maxwell screen to brighten things up as that option will be in the menu!
 
I shoot my NEX-5N with the screen fully flipped up, looking down on it about 80% of the time just for the pseudo TLR experience. If only the images had the quality of my Yashica LM.
 
I don't need it to be medium format even. A nice 24x24mm square would due for me... I'd even settle for a high quality LCD on top. ;)
 
I think the closest you'll ever get is Samsung's digital MF which is in a SLR format; if they release it that is :(
 
jky said:
Imagine looking down on a digital 6x6?!? Plus you probably won't need a Maxwell screen to brighten things up as that option will be in the menu!
Click to expand...

We don't need a TLR if we just want a big LCD to focus with.
The beauty of a TLR system is the ground glass (or fresnel) that forms the viewfinder.

Of course we'd want the sensor to match the size of the 6x6 film otherwise we'll lose the depth perception and basically back to infinite dof look of a typical digital P&S.
 
Isn't the film and the processing part of the experience? I would have thought so. Maybe I should try using a TLR one day, but every time I pick one up, the mirror image viewfinder scares me to death!
Noob question though, why would you want a digital TLR if you could have a Hasselblad with a waist level finder and digital back?

Not sure why, but when I came across this thread I had this weird image of one of those plastic lomo TLRs.
 
cambolt said:
Isn't the film and the processing part of the experience?
Click to expand...

Not to me... photography is photography no matter the medium. However, cameras are what is in my hand and I need to be comfortable with what is in my hand. There is nothing better for creative momentum than using a camera you absolutely love.
 
wait...... i don't want a digital back for my tlr...

i want my TLR to take a Polaroid Pack Back..

i am sure someone out there can package a lomo tlr with a FB-110c ?

I want one!

raytoei
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom