jonasv
has no mustache
traveller
Learning how to print
A impressive collection
Nachkebia
Well-known
As usual excellenty amazing photo`s and stories, but picture of the year... another step taken towards mobile photography, just imagine photo of the year in world press photo is so flat, lifeless, nothing else but document, excellent composition, excellent story or whatever but just look at it is an awfull peace of art! nor it has to be! but just look around other photos of the year, it was something megical....
DMG
waiting for friday
too much sorrow and not enough hope...
R
RML
Guest
DMG said:
That's one of the issues I have with WPP.
J. Borger
Well-known
Newsphotos should tell a story ........ not be a piece of art.Nachkebia said:
Salgado makes art ...... but when i look at his pictures i only see the beauty of his pictures instead of the sorrow or horror of the content ...... not good imho
Last edited:
V
varjag
Guest
If his images were ugly, you wouldn't look at them at all. To communicate, a photo should be good.J. Borger said:Newsphotos should tell a story ........ not be a piece of art.
Salgado makes art ...... but when i look at his pictures i only see the beauty of his pictures instead of the sorrow or horror of the content ...... not good imho
J. Borger
Well-known
I do not deny the photo has to be good .....varjag said:
But good can be defined on many leves ..... a good picture (= a picture that communicates what it is supposed to) does not have to be a piece of art .......
V
varjag
Guest
The language of photography is visual, and good photo is good visually. Not much can be done about it. Very few complain that say Erich Maria Remarque used mastery writing in describing trench life of the first World War, why not the case with photography?
Nachkebia
Well-known
in order to comunicate visualy you have to, I am not talking about why he shot digital, I am talking about why people like it, you like it and can never tell difference so does 99% of americans (maybe more) so do they like hollywood
I don`t think there is hope outside of pictures anyway, so showing alot of hope would meen closing eyes, do you want that? I know alot of people do
Topdog1
Well-known
traveller said:
...of anti-semitic trash.
/Ira
Nachkebia
Well-known
Topdog1 said:
Photo of the year is very pro-semitic for me
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
Topdog1 said:
flame on!
Two sides to every story... most have to do with the political actions of a country... not a religious or cultural statement.
Ororaro
Well-known
Nachkebia said:Photo of the year is very pro-semitic for me
So true....!
Topdog1
Well-known
rogue_designer said:
Of course that's what they'd like you to believe. And they've succeded, too. What a dupe!
/Ira
Topdog1
Well-known
NB23 said:
That is deffinitely anti-semitic. And I think you know it.
/Ira
Nachkebia
Well-known
Topdog1 said:
No it is not and I don`t know what you know.
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
Topdog1 said:
One could say the same thing about your statement.
Regardless. I don't condemn americans as a whole for the actions of their government. Nor do I condemn Palestinians, Israelis, Iraqis, North Koreans, etc... for the actions of theirs.
But I have no interest in arguing these points here. They are news photographs, and like anything photographed by man, there is no such thing as truly unbiased coverage. I'll grant that.
Topdog1
Well-known
rogue_designer said:
Well said...and point well taken.
/Ira
Oh Two
Established
Bias is in the eye of the beholder, editing belongs to the editor, censorship belongs to the prejudiced, and the critic belongs with the failing artist.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.