We have the metric system in Japan (and Australia too) but I do know that "oz" is the abbreviation of ounce.
1 ounce = 28.3495 grams
5 ounces = 141.7475 grams
6 ounces = 170.097 grams
BTW the OP hasn't logged in to RFF for over a year, and his last post was in April 2010, so I doubt he'll mind the side track to his thread.
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Thank you, Jonmanjiro, for this clarification.
Erik.
Erik.
maitani
Well-known
I have a late Nikkor-H 5cm f/2 which came with my S4, will put it on a balance one of those days 
maitani
Well-known
just put my late black 5 cm 1:2 nikkor-H serial 759xxx on the balance, it weighs 135.4 grams, just great for compactness on the S2.
it's one of my favourite 50ies ever besides the V3 pre-asph summilux.
it's one of my favourite 50ies ever besides the V3 pre-asph summilux.
sp9107sp
Well-known
lens
lens
lens
Erik van Straten
Veteran
Impressive collection of 50s, sp9107! Thank you for your input.
Erik.
Erik.
Range-rover
Veteran
Yes I would, now if they would just go back to making more lenses with that mount
again.
Range
again.
Range
raid
Dad Photographer
No, I would not get one. I do not own a Nikon RF camera. Nothing personal.
thegman
Veteran
No, not into the fast lenses.
Clint Troy
Well-known
Of course no one will buy it if they don't own a Nikon camera.
raid
Dad Photographer
Things have changed. I now am waiting for an S3 2000.
thompsonks
Well-known
But what's the change? Would you mount one of these clumsy things on your S3 2000 when you already have a 1.4 Millennium Nikkor? (Pardon my personal bias – it might be showing!)
raid
Dad Photographer
No, it s the other way around. I may mount a "clumsy" Nikon 35/1.8 on a fine Leica camera.
Highway 61
Revisited
You can't install the clumsy S-mount W-Nikkor-C 35/1.8 on a fine Leica camera using the Amedeo adapter. The clumsy lens rear group will hit the fine camera rangefinder pulley.
The clumsy S-mount W-Nikkor-C 35/2.5 fits, though.
Then you can source a fine LTM W-Nikkor-C 35/1.8 or the recent fine M-mount conversion of the clumsy 2005 lens but prepare your pesos, amigo.
raid
Dad Photographer
he he he
I do not have the 35/1.8, so I am spared such a trouble.
My Pesos were spent on a S3 2000 set .....
I do not have the 35/1.8, so I am spared such a trouble.
My Pesos were spent on a S3 2000 set .....
NikonSP
Member
I voted no since I have the Nikkor inner mount one already.
raid
Dad Photographer
If it will work well with an Amedeo adapter, you would have the lens also for the M mount. I have heard that this lens is an awesome lens, but I already have several excellent 50mm lenses.
Nikkor 50/1.4 Millenium
Leica Summicron 50/2, Summitar, Summar, Summarit
Canon 50/1.2 1.4 1.5
Zeiss Jens 50/1.5 ltm (a few) 50/2 ( a few) 50/3.5
Jupiter 3 50/1.5 (a few)
Luxon 50/2 ltm (for Braun Paxette)
Schneider 50/2.8 Xenon ltm (for the Retina)
Takumar 50/1.4 M (for Pentax)
Nikkor 50/1.4 Millenium
Leica Summicron 50/2, Summitar, Summar, Summarit
Canon 50/1.2 1.4 1.5
Zeiss Jens 50/1.5 ltm (a few) 50/2 ( a few) 50/3.5
Jupiter 3 50/1.5 (a few)
Luxon 50/2 ltm (for Braun Paxette)
Schneider 50/2.8 Xenon ltm (for the Retina)
Takumar 50/1.4 M (for Pentax)
raid
Dad Photographer
Highway 61
Revisited
Looks like clumsy pesos were sourced eventually...
Dez
Bodger Extraordinaire
No. Assuming the size would be similar to the M version, it's just too big and heavy.
Cheers,
Dez
Cheers,
Dez