lol small dent. i want to see your gear closet.
.
That would be "closets"...
lol small dent. i want to see your gear closet.
.
. Is it the best value? No, far from it.
That would be "closets"...
Like some others, you confuse value with cost. Only the buyer can assess value.
Dear Jeff,Like some others, you confuse value with cost.
😕 Bad alternative for me, akin to saying "I don't have to photograph anything."
The camera is just a tool for me. The digital Ms are the only tools that meet MY needs and preferences (and the M8.2 does that even better than the M9...for me).
So, the value is weighed against not shooting at all (not an option), or using a less than adequate and desirable tool to help create prints for pleasure and exhibit (also not an option).
@nickw: just picking up on two things you wrote:
"I've been wanting a Leica M for a few years now"
and
"I long for a fully manual camera again. Something well built which will get out of my way, and simply be a pleasure to use."
Have you considered a Leica M film camera? Might be something to bear in mind.
In all fairness you took my quote out of context, but you are right as well (per the definition of value). Since you decided to call me out, I will concede and say I should have used bargain.
is it like when bugs bunny goes to the cave that has aladdin's lamp?
Yeah... as an example... Before the big sell-off, I had two Dozen Nikkor 50mm F1.4 lenses in various mounts. I am down to 22 now.
This is what happens when you start collecting cameras as a kid. Half a century later, you find out that they accumulate.
Two dozen = 24, then down to 22? only sell two lenses?