Wow, big flickr change...

I agree with her.

the vast majority of pros are pros only in the sense that they make a paycheck from photographing things. and connotation of skill that goes with that applies to a small handful of people. none of whom have flickrs, as far as I am aware.
 
That's the problem with these type of websites - you can upload your work under one set of terms and conditions that are reasonable. Then the website can change the terms after the fact and expect to apply their new terms to previously uploaded images.

No, thanks...
 
At last Flickr looks goooood. I positively hated the old interface and look. I really can't understand people moaning about the way it looks now, as it looks stunning!!!

If they killed off the groups, that would be a bad move, as it was their USP. Have to find out if the userinterface has been improved!
 
I can access the old format but I can`t edit any of the captions.

Sure you can. Just hover over the image when the title pops up click the "caption icon or the O". The next page will show your caption in the top left corner. Highlight it and edit to what you want..
 
I'm basically OK with it on my PC at home, on a hard-wired FIOS connection. But on my Android phone, the new updated flickr ap is too slow. I have a Motorola Droid M phone, less than 6 months old. With wireless on, connecting to my home network with the FIOS connection via wireless, the phone goes to sleep before it can load the new flickr page. That might be what some folks with tablets are experiencing.
 


This is the fundamental problem and why it will not change. She views flicks as a place for people to store crappy cell phone pictures, not as a place for photographers.

Actually I agree with her to a point. Just read some of the comments when new members join a photo forum "Hi My name is _____________ and I am a professional photographer. I use ___________ camera kit with 55-?mm kit lens. I also use _________ flash (usually a cheap off brand flash)."

It looks to me like most every person who buys a digital DSLR (usually a comsumer grade model) thinks he/she is a pro..
 
I'll be glad when they get the bugs out of it ... it's very erratic at the moment which makes it hard to evaluate. I don't hate it ... I thought it was pretty horrible before and I don't really see that this is worse.

Compared to the latest incarnation of photobucket it's not so bad IMO.
 
Actually I agree with her to a point. Just read some of the comments when new members join a photo forum "Hi My name is _____________ and I am a professional photographer. I use ___________ camera kit with 55-?mm kit lens. I also use _________ flash (usually a cheap off brand flash)."

It looks to me like most every person who buys a digital DSLR (usually a comsumer grade model) thinks he/she is a pro..

Here is s quote from Leica's Schulz in a recent Forbes Magazine article:

Stephan Schulz: Leica had a long history with professionals throughout the 20th century. Most of these professionals were photojournalists. But we realized that in the 21st century, the image of our brand was becoming weaker because Leica was no longer as strongly represented among professionals.

In today’s professional market, photojournalists are a rare breed, and they are no longer as well paid as in previous generations. For a high-end brand that charges premium prices, this secular trend needed to be addressed.

We deemed it essential to maintain a strong position in the professional market, but we realized that we needed to fundamentally reinvent our approach. Above all, we needed a product that could appeal to the kind of professional photographers who are able to afford a professional camera. Today, these photographers predominantly work in fashion and commercial photography. They need a different type of camera than photojournalists who use the Leica M. Because of the nature of their assignments, fashion and advertising photographers tend to be committed medium-format users.

Translation: The M series is really not made for nor marketed to pros. Hobbyists are our bread and butter. Pros pa a lot, We want to be part of that market, and even a piece of a 6,000 units/year pie, we want in with the S2 systems (and to sell toBrad Pitt).

It used to be that Leica's were the pro camera for at least photojournalists...and dentists. So Yahoo's CEO is not off the track. If even Leica sees a huge chunk of the pro market veering towards a 6,000/year unit sales medium format, then the pro photographer market has truly shrunk even as the # of images generated and news stories has proliferated.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/marcbab...ng-the-medium-format-market-on-its-own-terms/
 
Last edited:
That's the problem with these type of websites - you can upload your work under one set of terms and conditions that are reasonable. Then the website can change the terms after the fact and expect to apply their new terms to previously uploaded images.

No, thanks...

You mean, just like banks, health funds, insurance companies, and governments? 🙁
 
At last Flickr looks goooood. I positively hated the old interface and look. I really can't understand people moaning about the way it looks now, as it looks stunning!!!

If they killed off the groups, that would be a bad move, as it was their USP. Have to find out if the userinterface has been improved!

I totally agree! I can't believe how many people are complaining about the look of the site...Its far better than before, you can see the images from your contracts WAAAY better nice big images...plus its really easy to browse though favorites, no 200 image limit for non pro users...I mean come on! What is wrong with people...
 
My flickr started running 100% on my comp. about 20 mins. ago. My main upset was I couldn't access my nor anyone elses photo's. Now that I see how it looks I'll get used to it. I do like that photo's are now featured on a black background.
 
I dislike the new layout and design too.

However, I mostly use flickr as an easy webhost for posting photos, so it really doesn't matter much. I rarely spend much time there. I use it to host the photos and post the links here and elsewhere.

G
 
I totally agree! I can't believe how many people are complaining about the look of the site...Its far better than before, you can see the images from your contracts WAAAY better nice big images...


Well, sure, one big picture (the most recent one) from my contacts. Where are the others? Looks like I have to click on their name to see the others. Frankly, except for a few close friends or some others I'm following closely, I'm just not going to spend the time to do that. Before, we could see thumbnails from the five most recent pics from each contact, so it was efficient and quick to see what they've been up to. Not any more.

I suppose if you're really gung-ho to get a lot of page views, just upload one pic at a time. Because the other four (out of the old five) just ain't gonna be seen by most people.

I still can't click on my own photostream or anyone else's here on the home computer. Works fine at work though. Come to think of it, that's how it behaved when I first joined and I was still on dialup.
 
I suspect that Flickr is currently enjoying about ten times their normal traffic, as people explore the new features, and upload all their best shots in much bigger resolution.

For Contacts, click on "Contacts" on the top menu bar. This shows me the same display it has for a few months, with several shots most recently posted from each contact (fewer if they are not active), in the big panel display. From there you can run a slideshow, look at the ones you click on individually, or go on to look at all the pics from a particular contact. If you just hover the cursor over "Contacts" on the menu bar, you get a bunch of other options.
 
Well, sure, one big picture (the most recent one) from my contacts. Where are the others? Looks like I have to click on their name to see the others. Frankly, except for a few close friends or some others I'm following closely, I'm just not going to spend the time to do that. Before, we could see thumbnails from the five most recent pics from each contact, so it was efficient and quick to see what they've been up to. Not any more.

Yeah, it's done by time now. So, if you upload 2 or more pics, you'll see the most recent one and up to four thumbnails in the bottom left corner. BUT, if they upload one every so often, I think they'll all appear. Right now, I've got two showing up from a contact, 20 minutes apart. I bet this is the kind of stuff they end up changing. I could see using a 12 or 24 hour window instead so your feed doesn't get all clogged up.
 
Back
Top Bottom