I found there was a small but real improvement in AF with the 35/1.4 between the X-Pro 1 and the X-T1.
Yes me too!
There might be a SMALL increase again with the original lenses and the XP2 (or I might be imagining it)
In a perverse way... I actually like that the XP1 offers a uniform AF/BBF speed across all of it's AF points (as all of them are CDAF)
Sometimes with the XT1, I'd select a point that was not PDAF and wonder for a nano second why the camera got slower!!
FWIW I'm not really into AF... I have a Pani LX100 that fills any sort of snap shot, my kid running about type thing AF requirement that I might have.
I even use the XP2 in MF (which in my case makes it about exactly as fast as the XP1, in terms of see/compose/focus/shoot)
That said, I played yesterday with the XP2 OVF and the 'zone' AF [with the 35/1.4] and it was accurate and a lot of fun!!
My personal jury's still out on the XP2...
The files are perhaps not quite as charming as the XP1, but they're very rich and detailed and lovely in their own right.
The implementation of the content of the OVF is awful, the AF-L button is hard to use, the ISO dial feels like it came of a Christmas cracker... I thought the ERF would be more useful, but it's early days yet.
I also discovered yesterday that if you have the optional grip on the XP2, and mount it to a tripod using the socket, then when you unscrew the camera (from the tripod), it also loosens the bolt that holds the grip to the camera.
But it's a good camera overall, and compared to the XP1, that extra stop of mech shutter (+ ES of course) and ISO is not to be sniffed at, and genuinely are of benefit to me. YMMV
I stand by my rhetoric! If you can live with a slow camera, a yester-yester-yester-year EVF, ISO6400 and 16MP, then the XP1 is pretty flawless, it's well designed, well made, easy to set up and use, all the buttons/dials have good haptics.
Not to mention little touches like, on the XP1 when you're in VF only / OVF mode - the XP1 stills displays menus, Q settings etc on the LCD.
The XP2 doesn't, you have to cycle through the view modes back to LCD (or eye sensor) then cycle back again when you're done.
All of the X ILC bodies that have succeeded the XP1 have been richer technically, but IMHO the XP1 is the closest that Fuji got to the correct user experience. (Caveat: I've never played with a X-T10)
YMMV.
@willie_901
I suspect you know all this
🙂 and I know I'm quoting you, but I wrote most of that for the benefit of other readers!