tennis-joe
Well-known
The XA2 was my main camera and I gave it to my son. He took it to Galveston and drove off after leaving it on the roof of his car. I later purchased an XA3 and an XA.. loved those small cameras.
FujiLove, wonderful color palette in the first one. And glad to see some contributions here besides my own.
John
Tmax 400
I'm very glad to see this. I've got a roll of T-max 400 in my XA2 at the moment. It's the first roll of this film that I've put through it, so I hadn't seen any results yet - until your post. Very nice... I'm greatly encouraged!
Some excellent images in this thread - it would be great to see some more. 🙂
I'm a pretty slow film shooter but will post some when I get there. Hope you do the same.
Thank you.
I shot a few rolls of T-max 400 in my Xpan earlier this year, and it's now become my favourite B&W film in 135 format. I love the detail it captures, and there's just something about it that works for me. I guess I like the spectral response.
Anyway, I've just posted a couple of images in the Pano thread so you can see what I mean (compressed by Flickr unfortunately). I'm currently using replenished XTOL, but I don't think the developer has a huge effect on the final result.
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2830452&postcount=1600
Likewise - film slows me down a lot by comparison with using digital (which is just one of the things I prefer about it).
I've just got set up for home developing, and either T-max 400 or HP5 will be my first attempt. 😱 (I have HP5 in another camera, and it will depend upon which roll is finished first).
The developer I have is Ilford Ifosol 3. I've no idea whether this is good or bad for T-max and/or HP5, but it's what I got from my suppliers. As a developing 'newbie', I'd welcome any hints on getting decent results (i.e. avoiding problems), from anyone with experience of using Ilfosol 3, in combination with T-max and HP5. 🙂 TIA.