Madrigal
Three-Shot Rose
At first I thought this vignetting was due to a lens hood I'd borrowed from a Konica Autoreflex.
But the next roll, sans hood, revealed the very same issue.
I mean, it's a nice effect and all, but I'd rather have a choice in the matter
3rd roll, same issue. Foolishly, I don't recall apertures, save for this shot.
f11
Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this? Seems to be the worst when stopped down.
Thanks!
But the next roll, sans hood, revealed the very same issue.
I mean, it's a nice effect and all, but I'd rather have a choice in the matter
3rd roll, same issue. Foolishly, I don't recall apertures, save for this shot.
f11
Does anyone have any idea what might be causing this? Seems to be the worst when stopped down.
Thanks!
owlsplace
Roger
No filters up front? ... Roger
Madrigal
Three-Shot Rose
No filters, no nuthin'. The B/W roll was a test roll with this issue in mind- nothing was up front- no fingers, either
Strange problem, eh?
Strange problem, eh?
pesphoto
Veteran
Sounds like a mystery for Greyhoundman
jamesj
Well-known
thats kinda cool....
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
You should never have put that Konica hood on it Rose ... it didn't like it!
It has to be the shutter ... surely!
Nice photos though!
It has to be the shutter ... surely!
Nice photos though!
owlsplace
Roger
Keith said:...It has to be the shutter ... surely!
Probably. The blades are not fully opening...
Madrigal
Three-Shot Rose
Ha! That's too funny! And very cool- never would have thought of that. New series... me and my periscopeChrisPlatt said:
Probably is the shutter having trouble. Wouldn't surprise me after 40 years. Really nice camera, though. My boyfriend found it at a Goodwill for $5.99. I never find deals like that :bang:
It's going on a trip to Idaho to see Dean Williams on Monday.