http://www.wihaib.com/02_personally_used_items.htmerikhaugsby said:Do you have a link to the site, Raid?
Chriscrawfordphoto said:You'd think a guy like Saddam would have something nicer...lol He and his family enriched themselves on the backs of Iraq's people....he could afford a leica!
dexdog said:Raid, this is just sad. Even if there is provenance connecting these items to Saddam, who would want to buy this stuff? If genuine, these items belong in an Iraqi government archive.
40oz said:let's be fair, Raid. The "plundering of the Iaqi Museum" took place after the curators removed the bulk of the items to other locations for safekeeping. What was left was empty cases and small items that were of lesser value and importance. So when the soldiers and press arrived, the place was stripped clean. Leaving an imprepression that all items had been stolen.
Scroll down for the real story "From Tragedy to Farce": http://www.museum-security.org/03/093.html
Saddam acquired his belongings on the backs of the people. Selling them off on ebay might not ensure the "proper" people get their due, but it is hardly any worse than their original acqusition, and far from "erasing history." And I somehow don't feel that a Yashica onced owned by a dictator of Iraq is a historically important artifact.
rogue_designer said:so... I'm confused. Buying (consuming) is pro-american. But Saddam was (supposedly) anti-american. Does buying his camera end up being anti, or is it a null sum kinda thing?
😉
But seriously, in principle, I agree with you, Raid. This item, and many others like it, should remain in Iraq.
raid said:The Iraqi Women Union used Hasselblad cameras.