Is this lens a new design or an old Schneider design used with the contax/Yashica lenses?
Huck Finn
Well-known
Jorge, are you talking about the 16/2.8 F-Distagon, sold for use on the Contax RTS & Aria SLR cameras?
Huck
Huck
Mazurka
Well-known
Huck Finn said:Jorge, are you talking about the 16/2.8 F-Distagon, sold for use on the Contax RTS & Aria SLR cameras?Huck
They are completely different designs. You can still look up (for now) details on the C/Y lenses on Zeiss' website.
C/Y distagon:


Mazurka
Well-known
Whoops, the F-distagon is a fisheye lens. Jorge must have the 3.5/15 in mind:
There is a resemblance between the C/Y and ZM versions, the latter probably derived from the former.
Was the C/Y lens really a Schneider design? Any reference to that?

There is a resemblance between the C/Y and ZM versions, the latter probably derived from the former.
Was the C/Y lens really a Schneider design? Any reference to that?
Last edited:
Huck Finn
Well-known
Thanks much, Dan.
Huck
Huck
dcsang
Canadian & Not A Dentist
Whichever design it is, I noted the price for that puppy and whoa... pricey.. but then again; other than CV's LTM mount 15.... there is no other game in town.
Dave
Dave
Huck Finn
Well-known
Dave, it strikes me as a specialty lens, which will probably only be bought by pros who need it for appications to which there is no other solution. That fact alone probably contributes heavily to its very high cost. Oh, yeah, and maybe by a few well-heeled types to whom money is no object will also buy it. But really . . . who would want to carry around such a monster. I don't think that something of this size is why any of us got into rangefinder photography.
i am thinking this would be great on an rd1 or digital m.
Alec
Amateur
Huck,Huck Finn said:But really . . . who would want to carry around such a monster. I don't think that something of this size is why any of us got into rangefinder photography.
I don't have the dimensions at hand, but this Distagon seems to have a 'Noctiluxlike' form factor and weight. I am not (yet?) a Noctilux devotee but I certainly enjoy using the Summilux 75 (another specialty lens, admittedly), although carrying it around is a different story!
Huck Finn
Well-known
Much bigger than a Noctilux, Alec. When Rover & I first saw a prototype at PhotoPlus Expo in New York, he referred to it as "a big bowl of soup." Good description! It's even bigger than the Summilux-M 75/1.4. Here are the dimensions of the 3 lenses in question:
Distagon 15/2.8 = 86 mm (length) with 72 mm filter
Noctilux 50/1.0 = 62 mm (length) with 60 mm filter
Summilux 75/1.4 = 80 mm (length) with 60 mm filter
Cheers . . .
Distagon 15/2.8 = 86 mm (length) with 72 mm filter
Noctilux 50/1.0 = 62 mm (length) with 60 mm filter
Summilux 75/1.4 = 80 mm (length) with 60 mm filter
Cheers . . .
JSpicer
Newbie
Jorge, I believe that the ZM 15mm is a new Zeiss design, based on their Cine lens experience. I doubt that they would need to license an old Schneider design.
John
John
I would love to see images from this bad boy.
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
Jorge Torralba said:i am thinking this would be great on an rd1 or digital m.
Just wait for Leica's wideangle "package" with the digital M, Jorge
Huck Finn
Well-known
jaapv said:Just wait for Leica's wideangle "package" with the digital M, Jorge
I don't know . . . If you think this one is expensive @ $3700, Leica's 15/2.8 Super Elmarit-R costs $7000!
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.