Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 Distagon T* ZM photos

Not a fan of the color at all! Overly warm and contrasty not my cup of tea.... I can't believe people actually like it, but whatever. Have fun.
Eh, that's why there are so many lenses, everyone gets to choose something they like. I used to love the Voigtlander Noktons until I got this lens, but now, the Distagon is all I shoot. I love rich contrast, deep saturation and a distinct 3D pop. Michael Bialecki's images got me into this lens, others on RFF encouraged me, and I am deeply satisfied with it.
 
Not a fan of the color at all! Overly warm and contrasty not my cup of tea.... I can't believe people actually like it, but whatever. Have fun.
I’d suggest the colour is the light and the camera more than the lens. Zeiss lenses, including this one, have consistently substantially cooler colour transmission than Leica lenses. It only really mattered when slide film was a dominant medium.

The contrast is high locally but very well handled globally, to me anyway. But preferences vary, of course.
 
I’d suggest the colour is the light and the camera more than the lens. Zeiss lenses, including this one, have consistently substantially cooler colour transmission than Leica lenses. It only really mattered when slide film was a dominant medium.

The contrast is high locally but very well handled globally, to me anyway. But preferences vary, of course.
Yes. Michael's photos in the majority of this thread were shot on Fuji ProImage 200, and the way he prefers his images is with a lot of warmth. I don't see a warm cast in my Distagon images, and I only make minor adjustments to con/sat/curve and HSL when processing M9 images. I don't see this image as being too warm or contrasty at all.

M9 - We Welcome The New Year by Archiver, on Flickr

Or this:

M9 - Two May Enter by Archiver, on Flickr
 
To give an idea of different lens rendering, this image was shot with the Voigtlander Ultron 35mm f1.7 LTM. Much lower contrast and less saturation. Same adjustments in post as I apply to Distagon images.

M9 - I so pale by Archiver, on Flickr
 
I’d suggest the colour is the light and the camera more than the lens. Zeiss lenses, including this one, have consistently substantially cooler colour transmission than Leica lenses. It only really mattered when slide film was a dominant medium.

The contrast is high locally but very well handled globally, to me anyway. But preferences vary, of course.
Well this has not been my experience at all really.... Leica stuff to me is generally more neutral coolish vs Zeiss stuff more warmish... YMMV... I think this film being used makes "enhances"or exaggerates the color... Not looking for an argument here I'm just stating what I see and what my experience has been.
 
Well this has not been my experience at all really.... Leica stuff to me is generally more neutral coolish vs Zeiss stuff more warmish... YMMV... I think this film being used makes "enhances"or exaggerates the color... Not looking for an argument here I'm just stating what I see and what my experience has been.
I measured the transmission spectra to remove the film from the measurement. It was quite enlightening. The difference in T stops compared to F stops might also make a difference - Zeiss lenses tended to have a greater transmission at a given f stop. Coating also plays a role here.
 
Back
Top Bottom