filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
It's not Kubrick's (and it's not mine), but apparently if you want that special Zeiss lens intended to shoot on the dark side of the moon, here's your chance. Only 10 ever made.
https://www.dpreview.com/news/249721...000-at-auction
https://www.dpreview.com/news/249721...000-at-auction
raid
Dad Photographer
My budget falls short here! Gorgeous. It is f 0.7 and not f 0.07.
oldwino
Well-known
This Zeiss f0.7, or the new Voigtlander f1.0?
Tough call…
Tough call…
raid
Dad Photographer
It was a difficult choice, but I went with the CV.
filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
My Bad, dyslexia hits again. Let me see if I can change it
My budget falls short here! Gorgeous. It is f 0.7 and not f 0.07.
kram
Well-known
I agree with raid, a hard call but I am going for the CV Nokton (it covers 35mm, not so the Zeiss f0.7).
Rob-F
Likes Leicas
I think it is not the aperture, but the depth of field, that is 0.07 (inches). 
filmtwit
Desperate but not serious
Kubrick had his modified to handle different focal lengths (other than 50mm), the one on the right was modified to 36mm (you could in theory have yours modified too)


I agree with raid, a hard call but I am going for the CV Nokton (it covers 35mm, not so the Zeiss f0.7).
Share: