raid
Dad Photographer
I added the Zeiss 35/2 after using a Summicron 35/2 V1 for many years, plus a pre-asph Summilux 35/1.4.
My case is a little bit different. I'm not justified to keep both lenses at the same time.I added the Zeiss 35/2 after using a Summicron 35/2 V1 for many years, plus a pre-asph Summilux 35/1.4.
I have three ZM lenses but for me the Biogon is an absolute standout .... I'm no optics expert but it has no faults that I can perceive .... near zero distortion, great flare resistance and sharp at all apertures and lately I've noticed you can pick up a near mint example for around seven hundred dollars!
Every time I use it on my 240 it really impresses me .... occasionally I wouldn't mind a stop of extra speed but over all I can see no reason to ever own any other 35mm lens. I've noticed in the poll we have running here it's around neck and neck with the Summicron in the vote count and that's impressive considering the price of a new Summicron against the Zeiss.
The size is excellent and on the 240 it focuses without issues unlike it's sibling the 50mm C Sonnar which can be damned hard to master with it's focus shift. It's probably my most used lens!
If you have any images from the 35mm Biogon feel free to put them here and we can celebrate one of Zeiss's finest optics.
![]()
Its only money ��After seeing the incredible images that Michael (michaelbialecki) was posting in his “Zeiss 35mm f/1.4 Distagon T* ZM photos” thread I thought “I really need to get that lens” until I saw the price.
Its only money ��
One area where the Distagon is far superior to the Biogon is coma control. The Biogon is pretty awful in that regard, whereas the Distagon is even better than the Summilux Asph.
Coma control? 🙂
Coma > the blurry wings around points of light.
Control > not having those blurry wings 😉
https://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2607352&postcount=18
You'd see a difference shooting Chinatown in Yokohama at night, but in the day time you certainly won't.