Zone Focus anyone?

FrankS said:
So Gabriel, when you're at a cafe doing this focusing exercise, do you notice people slowly getting up and finding tables farther away from you? 🙂
lol -- no. My camera has temporarily disappeared, once in a while, though. 😎
 
As several of the foregoing posts suggest---practice. practice and practice. Once you get used to it, it becomes natural. I almost always use zone focusing for any lens not longer than 40 mm. One reason is necessity. I used to have a Rollei 35 (with 40 mm lens and no rangefinder). But I also use my Olympus XA (35/2.8) by zone focussing. As a matter of fact, even though I have had the XA for over 10 years, it was only last year that I noticed that it had a rangefinder---the focussing patch was so faint that I didn't notice it. I also use my SLR lens (35/2) by zone focussing. Try it and use it, this is a truly liberating experience. It allows you to shoot anytime anywhere---if you preset your exposure or use an automatic exposure camera.
 
Ash said:
I tried the guessing vs rangefinder, but then I found I wasn't totally sure of my camera's rangefinder accuracy!! I'm going to pop into Peter Gilbert's and buy a rangefinder to carry in my pocket - maybe I'll take it everywhere to practice technique, and use it in cases where I need 'correct' focus

How about a builders tape measure ... that will set you apart from the crowd Ash!

😀
 
With the Standard Leica there is no rangefinder or even a viewfinder, so range-focusing is the only option available. It is fun with the 50/3.5 Elmar.

Raid
 
Ash, look out for a FODIS rangefinder on ebay; they come up at varying prices on the EU sites. Just make sure that the scale is either meter or feet to suit the scale on your camera. It gives you yet another piece of anachronistic kit to fiddle with to get a picture, but isn't that a good part of the reason for getting the Leica I in the first place?
Leave it on all the time you are out shooting - the sight of a photographer with a stalk coming out of his forehead seems to disarm the most belligerent street subject.
 
I am not 100% sure of what "zone focusing" is, but I would say that I might do something of a cross between zone and hyperfocus when using my wider lenses. In combination with aperture, my ideal in-focus range is just felt out and focused. I don't, almost ever, actually focus on anything. I estimate distance, estimate hyperfocus, set the aperture and distance on the lens, and fire.
 
Raid, my Standard has its own 50mm viewfinder on top. It's a 'Galileon" type or something. Basically built like a telescope in reverse. It's the clearest viewfinder I have ever seen! (attached is the original stock photo from MW Classic).

Apparently the laser-rangefinders can be very bulky or inaccurate, and those FODIS rangefinders are crazy!! Good job I'm not going to use either 😛
 

Attachments

  • 38472L.jpg
    38472L.jpg
    408.9 KB · Views: 0
Ash said:
Raid, my Standard has its own 50mm viewfinder on top. It's a 'Galileon" type or something. Basically built like a telescope in reverse. It's the clearest viewfinder I have ever seen! (attached is the original stock photo from MW Classic).

Apparently the laser-rangefinders can be very bulky or inaccurate, and those FODIS rangefinders are crazy!! Good job I'm not going to use either 😛

Ash: Is the 50mm finder permanently attached to the camera? My Standard has two accessory shoes. I have a Watameter rangefinder, but I hardly ever use it.

Raid
 
Raid, As the picture attached to my last post, it's permanently attached by 4 screws.


My initial attempts 'out of the bedroom window' seem to be semi-successful. Seems like it's true that judging distance comes from practice.
 
Ash said:
Raid, my Standard has its own 50mm viewfinder on top. It's a 'Galileon" type or something. Basically built like a telescope in reverse. It's the clearest viewfinder I have ever seen! (attached is the original stock photo from MW Classic).

Apparently the laser-rangefinders can be very bulky or inaccurate, and those FODIS rangefinders are crazy!! Good job I'm not going to use either 😛

That's almost as pretty as my 1a which has a fixed lens of course! Such a tiny camera!

😀
 
You people are all very scary in a way. I just shoot wide open all the time. It's going to take me.. forever to be able to accurately judge distance well enough to guess focus a shot at f/2 or f/1.4.

Can any of you do that? I'm actually almost certain that some of you has such skill. I'm possibly only certain of this because I am so horrible at judging distances and everyone else seems to do fine 😱
 
I tried it with a test roll the other day, but only at known distances. the images appeared in focus. The first roll i tried it with was appalling, however.
 
You know 2m already, the length of your bed.

You know 10m, maybe your garden.

You know 30m, as long as a public swimming pool.

Infinity is anything longer than the swimming pool.
 
Crasis said:
You people are all very scary in a way. I just shoot wide open all the time. It's going to take me.. forever to be able to accurately judge distance well enough to guess focus a shot at f/2 or f/1.4.

Can any of you do that? I'm actually almost certain that some of you has such skill. I'm possibly only certain of this because I am so horrible at judging distances and everyone else seems to do fine 😱

Judging distance is a skill. Like any skill, it's acquired by learning, and improves with practice. Most people underestimate the amount of practice needed to be proficient in a skill. Research on skill acquisition shows it takes about 50 trials for initial acquisition, 500 trials for mastery, and 5,000 trials for proficiency.

The important thing is to constantly give yourself feedback. Each time you use your RF, first mentally estimate the distance, focus and take your picture, then look at the distance scale, and compare to your estimate. You can also do dry runs whenever you have your camera in hand: estimate the distance, focus, and compare your estimate to the actual.

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised by how quickly ( a week or two) you can begin to estimate pretty close to the actual.
 
Back
Top Bottom